677 721

Cited 62 times in

Cost-effectiveness Outcomes of the National Gastric Cancer Screening Program in South Korea

Authors
 Eun Cho  ;  Moon Hae Kang  ;  Kui Son Choi  ;  MiNa Suh  ;  Jae Kwan Jun  ;  Eun-Cheol Park 
Citation
 ASIAN PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, Vol.14(4) : 2533-2540, 2013 
Journal Title
ASIAN PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION
ISSN
 1513-7368 
Issue Date
2013
MeSH
Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Early Detection of Cancer/economics* ; Early Detection of Cancer/mortality ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; National Health Programs* ; Prognosis ; Quality-Adjusted Life Years ; Republic of Korea ; Stomach Neoplasms/diagnosis* ; Stomach Neoplasms/economics* ; Stomach Neoplasms/mortality ; Survival Rate
Keywords
Cost ; effectiveness analysis ; economic evaluation ; gastric cancer screening ; stomach neoplasm ; Korea
Abstract
Background: Although screening is necessary where gastric cancer is particularly common in Asia, the
performance outcomes of mass screening programs have remained unclear. This study was conducted to evaluate
cost-effectiveness outcomes of the national cancer screening program (NCSP) for gastric cancer in South Korea.
Materials and Methods: People aged 40 years or over during 2002-2003 (baseline) were the target population.
Screening recipients and patients diagnosed with gastric cancers were identified using the NCSP and Korea
Central Cancer Registry databases. Clinical outcomes were measured in terms of mortality and life-years saved
(LYS) of gastric cancer patients during 7 years based on merged data from the Korean National Health Insurance
Corporation and National Statistical Office. We considered direct, indirect, and productivity-loss costs associated
with screening attendance. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) estimates were produced according to
screening method, sex, and age group compared to non-screening. Results: The age-adjusted ICER for survival
was 260,201,000-371,011,000 Korean Won (KW; 1USD=1,088 KW) for the upper-gastrointestinal (UGI) tract
over non-screening. Endoscopy ICERs were lower (119,099,000-178,700,000 KW/survival) than UGI. To increase
1 life-year, additional costs of approximately 14,466,000-15,014,000 KW and 8,817,000-9,755,000 KW were
required for UGI and endoscopy, respectively. Endoscopy was the most cost-effective strategy for males and
females. With regard to sensitivity analyses varying based on the upper age limit, endoscopy NCSP was dominant
for both males and females. For males, an upper limit of age 75 or 80 years could be considered. ICER estimates
for LYS indicate that the gastric cancer screening program in Korea is cost-effective. Conclusion: Endoscopy
should be recommended as a first-line method in Korea because it is beneficial among the Korean population.
Files in This Item:
T201301331.pdf Download
DOI
10.7314/APJCP.2013.14.5.2533
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Preventive Medicine (예방의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Park, Eun-Cheol(박은철) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2306-5398
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/86779
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links