0 20

Cited 0 times in

Cited 0 times in

Flexibility-enhancing Interventions for Ankle Range of Motion: A Network Meta-analysis

Authors
 Park, Jong Mi  ;  Lee, Kun Wook  ;  Yoon, Seo Yeon  ;  Kim, Yong Wook  ;  Lee, Sang Chul 
Citation
 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2026-06 
Journal Title
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE
ISSN
 0172-4622 
Issue Date
2026-06
Keywords
ankle joint ; range of motion, articular ; muscle stretching exercises ; myofascial release therapy ; network meta-analysis
Abstract
This systematic review and network meta-analysis compared the effectiveness of five flexibility-enhancing interventions-static stretching, dynamic stretching, ballistic stretching, proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation, and foam rolling-on ankle dorsiflexion range of motion in physically active healthy adults. A comprehensive search of multiple databases was conducted up to August 4, 2025. This review followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 guidelines and was registered in prospectively registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews. Effect sizes were synthesized using a random-effects network meta-analysis, and intervention rankings were based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve. Forty-one randomized controlled trials (n =1,670) were included. For the passive range of motion, proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (surface under the cumulative ranking curve: 76.8%) and foam rolling (67.8%) were the most effective overall. In long-term protocols (>1 mo), both proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (standardized mean difference 1.04 [0.64-1.44]) and foam rolling (standardized mean difference 1.03 [0.53-1.53]) remained superior to controls. For active range of motion, foam rolling ranked the highest (surface under the cumulative ranking curve: 87.2%) and demonstrated the largest short-term improvement, while static stretching showed the most favorable long-term maintenance (surface under the cumulative ranking curve: 72.4%). No intervention-related adverse events were reported. Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation and foam rolling are optimal for long-term flexibility enhancement, whereas foam rolling is recommended for short-term, pre-exercise movement preparation. Static stretching may support sustained active range of motion across extended training periods. Intervention selection should align with specific performance goals and training timelines.
Full Text
https://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/abstract/10.1055/a-2876-9237
DOI
10.1055/a-2876-9237
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Rehabilitation Medicine (재활의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Kim, Yong Wook(김용욱) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5234-2454
Park, Jong Mi(박종미)
Yoon, Seo Yeon(윤서연)
Lee, Sang Chul(이상철) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6241-7392
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/212959
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links