47 51

Cited 0 times in

Cited 0 times in

Radiographic Clarity of the External Auditory Meatus as a Cranial Reference Point in Spinal Deformity Patients: A Pilot Interobserver Study

Authors
 Kim, Dongkyu  ;  Chin, Dong Kyu  ;  Park, Sejun  ;  Kim, Jaemin  ;  Lee, Insu  ;  Ha, Jun-Woo  ;  Jang, Hyun Jun  ;  Kim, Kyung Hyun  ;  Park, Jeong Yoon  ;  Kuh, Sung Uk  ;  Kim, Keun Su  ;  Cho, Pyung Goo  ;  Moon, Bong Ju 
Citation
 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, Vol.15(8), 2026-04 
Article Number
 2971 
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
Issue Date
2026-04
Keywords
cranial center ; external auditory meatus ; sella turcica ; spinal deformity
Abstract
Background/Objectives: The external auditory meatus (EAM) is widely used as a surrogate cranial reference point, based on its proximity to the midpoint of the nasion-inion line (MNI). However, its radiographic clarity has not been thoroughly validated. This study aimed to evaluate the radiographic clarity and interobserver reproducibility of the EAM compared with the sella turcica as a control landmark. Methods: A retrospective review was performed on patients who underwent surgical correction for sagittal spinal deformity between 2021 and 2024. Preoperative standing whole-spine radiographs were analyzed. Horizontal and vertical distances from the EAM and the posterior border of the sella turcica to the MNI were measured. Radiographic clarity was categorized into three groups. Five independent neurosurgeons conducted all measurements, and interobserver reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient with a two-way random-effects model [ICC(2,1)]. Results: The EAM was horizontally closer to the MNI (1.1 mm vs. 13.8 mm) but exhibited poorer radiographic clarity, with only 14.1% classified as single point and clear compared with 84.5% for the sella turcica. Interobserver reproducibility was lower for the EAM (ICC: 0.84 horizontal, 0.89 vertical) than for the sella turcica (0.97, 0.95). Horizontal deviation among observers was significantly greater for the EAM (major deviation 6.3 mm vs. 2.2 mm, p < 0.001), whereas vertical deviation did not differ significantly. Conclusions: Although anatomically close to the MNI, the EAM demonstrated inferior radiographic clarity and reproducibility. These findings suggest that the EAM may have limitations as a cranial reference landmark.
Files in This Item:
92820.pdf Download
DOI
10.3390/jcm15082971
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Neurosurgery (신경외과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Kuh, Sung Uk(구성욱) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2566-3209
Kim, Kyung Hyun(김경현)
Kim, Keun Su(김근수) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3384-5638
Kim, Dongkyu(김동규)
Moon, Bong Ju(문봉주)
Park, Se Jun(박세준)
Park, Jeong Yoon(박정윤) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3728-7784
Jang, Hyun Jun(장현준)
Chin, Dong Kyu(진동규) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9835-9294
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/212134
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links