14 26

Cited 0 times in

Cited 0 times in

Ultrasound Imaging Features Associated With Neoplastic Gallbladder Polyps: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorLee, Sunyoung-
dc.contributor.authorChang, Won-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Yeun-Yoon-
dc.contributor.authorPark, Jin Young-
dc.contributor.authorJeon, Sun Kyung-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Jeong Eun-
dc.contributor.authorYoo, Jeongin-
dc.contributor.authorHan, Seungchul-
dc.contributor.authorPark, So Hyun-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Jae Hyun-
dc.contributor.authorPark, Hyo Jung-
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Hyun-Soo-
dc.contributor.authorYoon, Jeong Hee-
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-07T02:08:19Z-
dc.date.available2026-04-07T02:08:19Z-
dc.date.created2026-04-01-
dc.date.issued2026-04-
dc.identifier.issn1229-6929-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/211785-
dc.description.abstractObjective: Although most gallbladder polyps are benign, some neoplastic polyps may be malignant or may serve as precursors to malignancy. Distinguishing neoplastic and non-neoplastic polyps using imaging examinations remains a major challenge. This meta-analysis aimed to identify the ultrasound (US) features that are significantly associated with neoplastic polyps. Materials and Methods: The MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, and KoreaMed databases were searched for articles published up to August 31, 2025. Bivariate random-effects models were used to calculate the meta-analytic pooled diagnostic odds ratios (DORs), sensitivities, and specificities, along with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs), for each US imaging feature in the diagnosis of neoplastic polyps. Results: Thirty studies evaluating 8,953 patients, including 1,216 (13.6%) patients with neoplastic polyps, were included. Among the nine evaluated US imaging features, namely, size >= 10 mm, sessile morphology, single polyp, coexisting gallstones, hypoechogenicity, heterogeneous echogenicity, gallbladder wall thickening (GBWT), absence of hyperechoic spot, and vascularity, eight were significantly associated with neoplastic polyps: size >= 10 mm (DOR: 6.23 [95% CI: 1.86-20.90]), sessile morphology (DOR: 3.54 [1.93-5.97]), single polyp (DOR: 2.21 [1.76-2.74]), coexisting gallstones (DOR: 1.86 [1.29-2.60]), hypoechogenicity (DOR: 3.55 [1.47-7.30]), GBWT (DOR: 9.38 [1.47-32.20]), absence of hyperechoic spots (DOR: 4.23 [2.46-6.83]), and vascularity (DOR: 9.72 [5.81-15.30]). Of these, size >= 10 mm demonstrated the highest pooled sensitivity (0.79 [95% CI: 0.68-0.87]), whereas hypoechogenicity showed the highest pooled specificity (0.93 [95% CI: 0.82-0.98]). Conclusion: Eight US imaging features (size >= 10 mm, sessile morphology, single polyp, coexisting gallstones, hypoechogenicity, GBWT, absence of hyperechoic spots, and vascularity) were significantly associated with the presence of neoplastic polyps. These features may facilitate the management of gallbladder polyps.-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherKorean Society of Radiology-
dc.relation.isPartOfKOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY-
dc.relation.isPartOfKOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY-
dc.subject.MESHDiagnosis, Differential-
dc.subject.MESHGallbladder / diagnostic imaging-
dc.subject.MESHGallbladder Neoplasms* / diagnostic imaging-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHPolyps* / diagnostic imaging-
dc.subject.MESHPolyps* / pathology-
dc.subject.MESHSensitivity and Specificity-
dc.subject.MESHUltrasonography / methods-
dc.titleUltrasound Imaging Features Associated With Neoplastic Gallbladder Polyps: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLee, Sunyoung-
dc.contributor.googleauthorChang, Won-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, Yeun-Yoon-
dc.contributor.googleauthorPark, Jin Young-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJeon, Sun Kyung-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLee, Jeong Eun-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYoo, Jeongin-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHan, Seungchul-
dc.contributor.googleauthorPark, So Hyun-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, Jae Hyun-
dc.contributor.googleauthorPark, Hyo Jung-
dc.contributor.googleauthorZhang, Hyun-Soo-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYoon, Jeong Hee-
dc.identifier.doi10.3348/kjr.2025.1126-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ02884-
dc.identifier.eissn2005-8330-
dc.identifier.pmid41776850-
dc.subject.keywordGallbladder-
dc.subject.keywordNeoplastic polyp-
dc.subject.keywordUltrasound-
dc.subject.keywordSystematic review-
dc.subject.keywordMeta-analysis-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorLee, Sunyoung-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorZhang, Hyun-Soo-
dc.identifier.wosid001724504800005-
dc.citation.volume27-
dc.citation.number4-
dc.citation.startPage332-
dc.citation.endPage343-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationKOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, Vol.27(4) : 332-343, 2026-04-
dc.identifier.rimsid92272-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorGallbladder-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorNeoplastic polyp-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorUltrasound-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorSystematic review-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorMeta-analysis-
dc.subject.keywordPlusCONTRAST-ENHANCED ULTRASOUND-
dc.subject.keywordPlusSCORING SYSTEM-
dc.subject.keywordPlusRISK-FACTORS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPREDICT-
dc.subject.keywordPlusLESIONS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusULTRASONOGRAPHY-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPREVALENCE-
dc.subject.keywordPlusSTRATEGY-
dc.subject.keywordPlusADENOMA-
dc.type.docTypeReview-
dc.identifier.kciidART003315017-
dc.description.isOpenAccessY-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscie-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClasskci-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryRadiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaRadiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Radiology (영상의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Biomedical Systems Informatics (의생명시스템정보학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.