11 26

Cited 0 times in

Cited 0 times in

Long-Term Outcomes of Long-Course Chemoradiotherapy vs. Short-Course Radiotherapy Followed by Consolidation Chemotherapy in Rectal Cancer

Authors
 Lee, Jong Min  ;  Lee, Jeehye  ;  Kim, Taehyung  ;  Kim, Nam Kyu  ;  Cho, Min Soo 
Citation
 YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL, Vol.66(12) : 891-896, 2025-12 
Journal Title
YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL
ISSN
 0513-5796 
Issue Date
2025-12
MeSH
Adult ; Aged ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / therapeutic use ; Chemoradiotherapy* / methods ; Consolidation Chemotherapy* / methods ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Prospective Studies ; Rectal Neoplasms* / drug therapy ; Rectal Neoplasms* / mortality ; Rectal Neoplasms* / radiotherapy ; Rectal Neoplasms* / therapy ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome
Keywords
Rectal neoplasm ; neoadjuvant therapy ; chemoradiotherapy ; diseases free survival
Abstract
Purpose: Previous studies have demonstrated that short-course radiotherapy (SCRT), followed by consolidation chemotherapy (CCT), produces oncologic outcomes comparable to those of long-course chemoradiotherapy (LCRT). However, more recent long-term data have raised concerns regarding the durability of these benefits. This study aimed to assess the long-term surgical and oncologic outcomes of SCRT with CCT vs. LCRT, using data from the ESCORT trial. Materials and Methods: This comparative study included 62 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Patients in the SCRT group (n=27) were prospectively enrolled in the ESCORT trial (NCT03676517), a single-arm phase II study conducted from 2018 to 2020. They received five daily fractions of 5 Gy, followed by two cycles of XELOX, and surgery after 4 weeks. A matched cohort of 35 patients who underwent LCRT during the same period was retrospectively identified from institutional records. Results: With a median follow-up of 4.75 years for the SCRT group and 4.94 years for the LCRT group, the 5-year overall survival rates were similar between the groups (SCRT: 100% vs. LCRT: 97.1%, p=0.382). The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 83.6% for SCRT and 70.3% for LCRT (p=0.237). In multivariable analysis, SCRT was not associated with inferior DFS (hazard ratio, 0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.14-2.04). Delayed anastomosis-related complications occurred at similar rates (18.5% vs. 20.0%; p=0.884). Conclusion: SCRT with CCT demonstrated long-term oncologic outcomes and surgical safety comparable to those of LCRT, supporting its role as a viable alternative, particularly in resource-constrained healthcare settings.
Files in This Item:
90936.pdf Download
DOI
10.3349/ymj.2025.0216
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Surgery (외과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Kim, Nam Kyu(김남규) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0639-5632
Kim, Tae Hyung(김태형)
Lee, Jong Min(이종민) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1654-1533
Lee, Jeehye(이지혜)
Cho, Min Soo(조민수)
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/210034
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links