11 26

Cited 0 times in

Cited 0 times in

Long-Term Outcomes of Long-Course Chemoradiotherapy vs. Short-Course Radiotherapy Followed by Consolidation Chemotherapy in Rectal Cancer

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorLee, Jong Min-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Jeehye-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Taehyung-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Nam Kyu-
dc.contributor.authorCho, Min Soo-
dc.contributor.author김남규-
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-20T05:28:07Z-
dc.date.available2026-01-20T05:28:07Z-
dc.date.created2026-01-14-
dc.date.issued2025-12-
dc.identifier.issn0513-5796-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/210034-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Previous studies have demonstrated that short-course radiotherapy (SCRT), followed by consolidation chemotherapy (CCT), produces oncologic outcomes comparable to those of long-course chemoradiotherapy (LCRT). However, more recent long-term data have raised concerns regarding the durability of these benefits. This study aimed to assess the long-term surgical and oncologic outcomes of SCRT with CCT vs. LCRT, using data from the ESCORT trial. Materials and Methods: This comparative study included 62 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Patients in the SCRT group (n=27) were prospectively enrolled in the ESCORT trial (NCT03676517), a single-arm phase II study conducted from 2018 to 2020. They received five daily fractions of 5 Gy, followed by two cycles of XELOX, and surgery after 4 weeks. A matched cohort of 35 patients who underwent LCRT during the same period was retrospectively identified from institutional records. Results: With a median follow-up of 4.75 years for the SCRT group and 4.94 years for the LCRT group, the 5-year overall survival rates were similar between the groups (SCRT: 100% vs. LCRT: 97.1%, p=0.382). The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 83.6% for SCRT and 70.3% for LCRT (p=0.237). In multivariable analysis, SCRT was not associated with inferior DFS (hazard ratio, 0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.14-2.04). Delayed anastomosis-related complications occurred at similar rates (18.5% vs. 20.0%; p=0.884). Conclusion: SCRT with CCT demonstrated long-term oncologic outcomes and surgical safety comparable to those of LCRT, supporting its role as a viable alternative, particularly in resource-constrained healthcare settings.-
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherYonsei University-
dc.relation.isPartOfYONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL-
dc.relation.isPartOfYONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL-
dc.subject.MESHAdult-
dc.subject.MESHAged-
dc.subject.MESHAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / therapeutic use-
dc.subject.MESHChemoradiotherapy* / methods-
dc.subject.MESHConsolidation Chemotherapy* / methods-
dc.subject.MESHFemale-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHMale-
dc.subject.MESHMiddle Aged-
dc.subject.MESHProspective Studies-
dc.subject.MESHRectal Neoplasms* / drug therapy-
dc.subject.MESHRectal Neoplasms* / mortality-
dc.subject.MESHRectal Neoplasms* / radiotherapy-
dc.subject.MESHRectal Neoplasms* / therapy-
dc.subject.MESHRetrospective Studies-
dc.subject.MESHTreatment Outcome-
dc.titleLong-Term Outcomes of Long-Course Chemoradiotherapy vs. Short-Course Radiotherapy Followed by Consolidation Chemotherapy in Rectal Cancer-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLee, Jong Min-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLee, Jeehye-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, Taehyung-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, Nam Kyu-
dc.contributor.googleauthorCho, Min Soo-
dc.identifier.doi10.3349/ymj.2025.0216-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ02813-
dc.identifier.eissn1976-2437-
dc.identifier.pmid41287502-
dc.subject.keywordRectal neoplasm-
dc.subject.keywordneoadjuvant therapy-
dc.subject.keywordchemoradiotherapy-
dc.subject.keyworddiseases free survival-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorLee, Jong Min-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorLee, Jeehye-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Taehyung-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Nam Kyu-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorCho, Min Soo-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-105022761717-
dc.identifier.wosid001622336200011-
dc.citation.volume66-
dc.citation.number12-
dc.citation.startPage891-
dc.citation.endPage896-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationYONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL, Vol.66(12) : 891-896, 2025-12-
dc.identifier.rimsid90936-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorRectal neoplasm-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorneoadjuvant therapy-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorchemoradiotherapy-
dc.subject.keywordAuthordiseases free survival-
dc.subject.keywordPlusANASTOMOTIC LEAKAGE-
dc.subject.keywordPlusSURGERY-
dc.subject.keywordPlusCHEMORADIATION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPHASE-3-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.identifier.kciidART003265252-
dc.description.isOpenAccessY-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscie-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClasskci-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryMedicine, General & Internal-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaGeneral & Internal Medicine-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Surgery (외과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.