5 13

Cited 0 times in

Cited 0 times in

Impact of toothbrushing on aesthetic and mechanical properties of hydrophilic antibacterial coating materials for orthodontic clear retainers

Authors
 Oh, Young-Eun  ;  Yu, Hyung-Seog  ;  Choi, Sung-Hwan  ;  Choi, Tae-Hyun  ;  Kwon, Jae-Sung  ;  Cha, Jung-Yul 
Citation
 SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, Vol.15(1), 2025-11 
Article Number
 41541 
Journal Title
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Issue Date
2025-11
MeSH
Anti-Bacterial Agents* / chemistry ; Anti-Bacterial Agents* / pharmacology ; Bacterial Adhesion / drug effects ; Coated Materials, Biocompatible* / chemistry ; Coated Materials, Biocompatible* / pharmacology ; Esthetics, Dental ; Humans ; Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions ; Materials Testing ; Polyurethanes / chemistry ; Streptococcus mutans / drug effects ; Surface Properties ; Tensile Strength ; Toothbrushing* / methods
Keywords
Orthodontic clear retainer ; Antibacterial effect ; Hydrophilic coating ; Physical properties ; Transparency ; Surface roughness
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the aesthetic, mechanical, and antibacterial properties of clear retainer materials with an antibacterial coating. Specifically, it evaluates whether the coating can retain its effectiveness after repeated toothbrushing by assessing material integrity, surface roughness, and bacterial adhesion in vitro. Four types of 1.0-mm thermoplastic sheets widely used in orthodontic clear retainers were tested: PUL (Magicfoil R, Osstem, Korea), PUC (Magicfoil R with a hydrophilic antibacterial coating), PUZ (Zendura, Bay Materials, USA), and PET (CA Retention Foil, Scheu-Dental, Germany). The PUL, PUC, and PUZ sheets were composed of polyurethane (PU), whereas the PET sheets were made of polyethylene terephthalate glycol (PETG). Flexural strength, tensile strength, and cyclic load tests were conducted to compare the mechanical properties of these four materials, and transparency was compared to evaluate aesthetic properties. The surface roughness of the specimens and the antibacterial ability against Streptococcus mutans were measured before and after toothbrushing. The antibacterial coating did not change the mechanical or aesthetic properties of the retainer material. After brushing, all types' materials had similar surface roughness values as before brushing. Additionally, the antibacterial coating group (PUC) exhibited lower bacterial adhesion than the uncoated group (PUL), with reductions of 36% before and 40% after toothbrushing. The difference was statistically significant before toothbrushing (p < 0.05), but not after simulated toothbrushing. These results confirm that the hydrophilic coating has an antibacterial effect and that this effect can be maintained even after repeated toothbrushing.
Files in This Item:
90739.pdf Download
DOI
10.1038/s41598-025-25437-y
Appears in Collections:
2. College of Dentistry (치과대학) > Dept. of Orthodontics (교정과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
2. College of Dentistry (치과대학) > Dept. of Dental Biomaterials and Bioengineering (치과생체재료공학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Kwon, Jae-Sung(권재성) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9803-7730
Yu, Hyung Seog(유형석) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1275-5078
Cha, Jung Yul(차정열)
Choi, Sung Hwan(최성환) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1150-0268
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/209910
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links