5 44

Cited 0 times in

Cited 0 times in

The ethics of simplification: balancing patient autonomy, comprehension, and accuracy in AI-generated radiology reports

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorLee, Hong-Seon-
dc.contributor.authorSong, Seung-Hyun-
dc.contributor.authorPark, Chaeri-
dc.contributor.authorSeo, Jeongrok-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Won Hwa-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Jaeil-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Sungjun-
dc.contributor.authorHan, Kyunghwa-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Young Han-
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-02T06:42:40Z-
dc.date.available2025-12-02T06:42:40Z-
dc.date.created2026-01-02-
dc.date.issued2025-10-
dc.identifier.issn*-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/209316-
dc.description.abstractBackgroundLarge language models (LLMs) such as GPT-4 are increasingly used to simplify radiology reports and improve patient comprehension. However, excessive simplification may undermine informed consent and autonomy by compromising clinical accuracy. This study investigates the ethical implications of readability thresholds in AI-generated radiology reports, identifying the minimum reading level at which clinical accuracy is preserved.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 500 computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging reports from a tertiary hospital. Each report was transformed into 17 versions (reading grade levels 1-17) using GPT-4 Turbo. Readability metrics and word counts were calculated for each version. Clinical accuracy was evaluated using radiologist assessments and PubMed-BERTScore. We identified the first grade level at which a statistically significant decline in accuracy occurred, determining the lowest level that preserved both accuracy and readability. We further assessed potential clinical consequences in reports simplified to the 7th-grade level.ResultsReadability scores showed strong correlation with prompted reading levels (r = 0.80-0.84). Accuracy remained stable across grades 13-11 but declined significantly below grade 11. At the 7th-grade level, 20% of reports contained inaccuracies with potential to alter patient management, primarily due to omission, incorrect conversion, or inappropriate generalization. The 11th-grade level emerged as the current lower bound for preserving accuracy in LLM-generated radiology reports.ConclusionsOur findings highlight an ethical tension between improving readability and maintaining clinical accuracy. While 7th-grade readability remains an ethical ideal, current AI tools cannot reliably produce accurate reports below the 11th-grade level. Ethical implementation of AI-generated reporting should include layered communication strategies and model transparency to safeguard patient autonomy and comprehension.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherBioMed Central-
dc.relation.isPartOfBMC MEDICAL ETHICS-
dc.relation.isPartOfBMC MEDICAL ETHICS-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.subject.MESHArtificial Intelligence* / ethics-
dc.subject.MESHComprehension*-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHInformed Consent / ethics-
dc.subject.MESHMagnetic Resonance Imaging-
dc.subject.MESHPersonal Autonomy*-
dc.subject.MESHRadiology* / ethics-
dc.subject.MESHRetrospective Studies-
dc.subject.MESHTomography, X-Ray Computed-
dc.titleThe ethics of simplification: balancing patient autonomy, comprehension, and accuracy in AI-generated radiology reports-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Radiology (영상의학교실)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLee, Hong-Seon-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSong, Seung-Hyun-
dc.contributor.googleauthorPark, Chaeri-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSeo, Jeongrok-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, Won Hwa-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, Jaeil-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, Sungjun-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHan, Kyunghwa-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLee, Young Han-
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12910-025-01285-3-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ03987-
dc.identifier.eissn1472-6939-
dc.identifier.pmid41094535-
dc.subject.keywordAI-generated radiology reports-
dc.subject.keywordLarge Language Models-
dc.subject.keywordReadability and comprehension-
dc.subject.keywordClinical accuracy-
dc.subject.keywordPatient autonomy-
dc.subject.keywordInformed consent-
dc.subject.keywordEthical implications-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Sungjun-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorLee, Hong-Seon-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorSong, Seung-Hyun-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorPark, Chaeri-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Sungjun-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorHan, Kyunghwa-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorLee, Young Han-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-105018893396-
dc.identifier.wosid001594099700003-
dc.citation.volume26-
dc.citation.number1-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationBMC MEDICAL ETHICS, Vol.26(1), 2025-10-
dc.identifier.rimsid90571-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorAI-generated radiology reports-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorLarge Language Models-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorReadability and comprehension-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorClinical accuracy-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorPatient autonomy-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorInformed consent-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorEthical implications-
dc.subject.keywordPlusHEALTH LITERACY-
dc.subject.keywordPlusREADABILITY-
dc.subject.keywordPlusCOMMUNICATION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusENGAGEMENT-
dc.subject.keywordPlusCARE-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.description.isOpenAccessY-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscie-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassssci-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryEthics-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryMedical Ethics-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategorySocial Sciences, Biomedical-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaSocial Sciences - Other Topics-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaMedical Ethics-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaBiomedical Social Sciences-
dc.identifier.articleno136-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Radiology (영상의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.