Cited 0 times in 
Cited 0 times in 
The ethics of simplification: balancing patient autonomy, comprehension, and accuracy in AI-generated radiology reports
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | 김성준 | - |
| dc.contributor.author | 이영한 | - |
| dc.contributor.author | 이홍선 | - |
| dc.contributor.author | 한경화 | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-12-02T06:42:40Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-12-02T06:42:40Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-10 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | * | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/209316 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Background: Large language models (LLMs) such as GPT-4 are increasingly used to simplify radiology reports and improve patient comprehension. However, excessive simplification may undermine informed consent and autonomy by compromising clinical accuracy. This study investigates the ethical implications of readability thresholds in AI-generated radiology reports, identifying the minimum reading level at which clinical accuracy is preserved. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 500 computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging reports from a tertiary hospital. Each report was transformed into 17 versions (reading grade levels 1-17) using GPT-4 Turbo. Readability metrics and word counts were calculated for each version. Clinical accuracy was evaluated using radiologist assessments and PubMed-BERTScore. We identified the first grade level at which a statistically significant decline in accuracy occurred, determining the lowest level that preserved both accuracy and readability. We further assessed potential clinical consequences in reports simplified to the 7th-grade level. Results: Readability scores showed strong correlation with prompted reading levels (r = 0.80-0.84). Accuracy remained stable across grades 13-11 but declined significantly below grade 11. At the 7th-grade level, 20% of reports contained inaccuracies with potential to alter patient management, primarily due to omission, incorrect conversion, or inappropriate generalization. The 11th-grade level emerged as the current lower bound for preserving accuracy in LLM-generated radiology reports. Conclusions: Our findings highlight an ethical tension between improving readability and maintaining clinical accuracy. While 7th-grade readability remains an ethical ideal, current AI tools cannot reliably produce accurate reports below the 11th-grade level. Ethical implementation of AI-generated reporting should include layered communication strategies and model transparency to safeguard patient autonomy and comprehension. | - |
| dc.description.statementOfResponsibility | open | - |
| dc.language | English | - |
| dc.publisher | BioMed Central | - |
| dc.relation.isPartOf | BMC MEDICAL ETHICS | - |
| dc.rights | CC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR | - |
| dc.subject.MESH | Artificial Intelligence* / ethics | - |
| dc.subject.MESH | Comprehension* | - |
| dc.subject.MESH | Humans | - |
| dc.subject.MESH | Informed Consent / ethics | - |
| dc.subject.MESH | Magnetic Resonance Imaging | - |
| dc.subject.MESH | Personal Autonomy* | - |
| dc.subject.MESH | Radiology* / ethics | - |
| dc.subject.MESH | Retrospective Studies | - |
| dc.subject.MESH | Tomography, X-Ray Computed | - |
| dc.title | The ethics of simplification: balancing patient autonomy, comprehension, and accuracy in AI-generated radiology reports | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.contributor.college | College of Medicine (의과대학) | - |
| dc.contributor.department | Dept. of Radiology (영상의학교실) | - |
| dc.contributor.googleauthor | Hong-Seon Lee | - |
| dc.contributor.googleauthor | Seung-Hyun Song | - |
| dc.contributor.googleauthor | Chaeri Park | - |
| dc.contributor.googleauthor | Jeongrok Seo | - |
| dc.contributor.googleauthor | Won Hwa Kim | - |
| dc.contributor.googleauthor | Jaeil Kim | - |
| dc.contributor.googleauthor | Sungjun Kim | - |
| dc.contributor.googleauthor | Kyunghwa Han | - |
| dc.contributor.googleauthor | Young Han Lee | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1186/s12910-025-01285-3 | - |
| dc.contributor.localId | A00585 | - |
| dc.contributor.localId | A02967 | - |
| dc.contributor.localId | A05610 | - |
| dc.contributor.localId | A04267 | - |
| dc.relation.journalcode | J03987 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1472-6939 | - |
| dc.identifier.pmid | 41094535 | - |
| dc.subject.keyword | AI-generated radiology reports | - |
| dc.subject.keyword | Clinical accuracy | - |
| dc.subject.keyword | Ethical implications | - |
| dc.subject.keyword | Informed consent | - |
| dc.subject.keyword | Large Language Models | - |
| dc.subject.keyword | Patient autonomy | - |
| dc.subject.keyword | Readability and comprehension | - |
| dc.contributor.alternativeName | Kim, Sungjun | - |
| dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | 김성준 | - |
| dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | 이영한 | - |
| dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | 이홍선 | - |
| dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | 한경화 | - |
| dc.citation.volume | 26 | - |
| dc.citation.number | 1 | - |
| dc.citation.startPage | 136 | - |
| dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | BMC MEDICAL ETHICS, Vol.26(1) : 136, 2025-10 | - |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.