17 29

Cited 0 times in

Cited 0 times in

Expandable Cage in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Comparative Data with Static Cage from a Single Institution and a Single Surgeon

Authors
 Dongkyu Kim  ;  Hyun Jun Jang  ;  Bong Ju Moon  ;  Kyung Hyun Kim  ;  Sung Uk Kuh  ;  Dong Kyu Chin  ;  Keun Su Kim  ;  Jeong Yoon Park 
Citation
 WORLD NEUROSURGERY, Vol.202 : 124428, 2025-10 
Journal Title
WORLD NEUROSURGERY
ISSN
 1878-8750 
Issue Date
2025-10
MeSH
Adult ; Aged ; Female ; Humans ; Intervertebral Disc Degeneration* / diagnostic imaging ; Intervertebral Disc Degeneration* / surgery ; Lumbar Vertebrae* / diagnostic imaging ; Lumbar Vertebrae* / surgery ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures* / instrumentation ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures* / methods ; Retrospective Studies ; Spinal Fusion* / instrumentation ; Spinal Fusion* / methods ; Treatment Outcome
Keywords
Expandable cage ; Minimally invasive surgery ; Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
Abstract
Background: Minimally invasive surgery-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) is widely adopted for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease. Expandable cages are now increasingly used in MIS-TLIF to facilitate disc height restoration in narrow spaces. Despite theoretical advantages, the clinical and radiologic outcomes of expandable cage compared to static cage remain controversial.

Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 151 patients who underwent single-level lumbar MIS-TLIF performed by a single surgeon at a single institution, with more than 1-year follow-up. Static cages were exclusively used from May 2022 to March 2023 (n = 76), and expandable cages from April 2023 to March 2024 (n = 75). The primary outcomes were radiological disc height and lordotic angles.

Results: The expandable cage group demonstrated significantly greater postoperative disc height restoration compared to the static cage group at both immediate postoperative periods (10.3 ± 1.2 mm vs. 9.5 ± 1.5 mm, P = 0.003) and at 1-year follow-ups (9.6 ± 1.4 mm vs. 9.0 ± 1.6 mm, P = 0.028). There were no significant differences between the groups in lordotic angles, fusion rates, and clinical outcomes. Various complications were also comparable, other than the incidence of cage subsidence > 3 mm, which was higher in the expandable cage group (14.7% vs. 3.9%, P = 0.047).

Conclusions: Expandable cages in MIS-TLIF demonstrated superior disc height restoration compared to static cages, which were maintained throughout a 1-year follow-up period despite the relatively higher subsidence rate. No significant differences were observed in terms of lordotic angle restoration, clinical outcomes, or fusion rates.
Files in This Item:
T202506681.pdf Download
DOI
10.1016/j.wneu.2025.124428
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Neurosurgery (신경외과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Kuh, Sung Uk(구성욱) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2566-3209
Kim, Kyung Hyun(김경현)
Kim, Keun Su(김근수) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3384-5638
Moon, Bong Ju(문봉주)
Park, Jeong Yoon(박정윤) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3728-7784
Jang, Hyun Jun(장현준)
Chin, Dong Kyu(진동규) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9835-9294
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/209141
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links