0 40

Cited 0 times in

Cited 0 times in

Application of LI-RADS CT/MRI Radiation Treatment Response Assessment Version 2024: a study after transarterial radioembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author김경민-
dc.contributor.author원종윤-
dc.contributor.author윤자경-
dc.contributor.author이선영-
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-17T08:02:49Z-
dc.date.available2025-10-17T08:02:49Z-
dc.date.issued2025-09-
dc.identifier.issn1867-1071-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/207625-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To compare the performance of the LI-RADS CT/MRI Radiation Treatment Response Assessment (TRA) version 2024 (v2024) after transarterial radioembolization (TARE) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with that of the LI-RADS CT/MRI TRA version 2017 (v2017). Methods: This retrospective study included patients with HCC treated with TARE followed by hepatic surgery between November 2012 and April 2023 at two tertiary referral centers. Each treated lesion was assigned an LI-RADS treatment response (LR-TR) category based on a consensus reading of three radiologists using both v2024 and v2017. The sensitivity and specificity of the two TRA versions were compared using the McNemar test, with histopathology as a reference standard. Results: A total of 46 (mean age, 56.2 years; 39 men) patients with 46 TARE-treated lesions (23 with incomplete [< 100%] necrosis) were included. The distribution of categories based on v2024 was as follows: LR-TR Nonviable, 52.2% (24/46); LR-TR Nonprogressing, 39.1% (18/46); and LR-TR Viable, 8.7% (4/46). While no category change was noted for LR-TR Nonviable lesions, 16 lesions classified as LR-TR Viable in v2017 were recategorized as LR-TR Nonprogressing in v2024. For predicting histopathologically incomplete necrosis, the LR-TR Viable or Nonprogressing categories of v2024 and the LR-TR Viable or Equivocal categories of v2017 showed equivalent high sensitivity (87.0%; 20/23; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 67.9, 95.5) and specificity (91.3%; 21/23; 95% CI 73.2, 97.6) (all P > 0.99). Conclusion: While applying the updated radiation TRA v2024 resulted in recategorization, its diagnostic performance in predicting tumor viability was comparable to that of TRA v2017.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityrestriction-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherSpringer-
dc.relation.isPartOfJAPANESE JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY(Japanese Journal of Radiology)-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.subject.MESHAdult-
dc.subject.MESHAged-
dc.subject.MESHCarcinoma, Hepatocellular* / diagnostic imaging-
dc.subject.MESHCarcinoma, Hepatocellular* / radiotherapy-
dc.subject.MESHCarcinoma, Hepatocellular* / therapy-
dc.subject.MESHEmbolization, Therapeutic* / methods-
dc.subject.MESHFemale-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHLiver Neoplasms* / diagnostic imaging-
dc.subject.MESHLiver Neoplasms* / radiotherapy-
dc.subject.MESHLiver Neoplasms* / therapy-
dc.subject.MESHMagnetic Resonance Imaging* / methods-
dc.subject.MESHMale-
dc.subject.MESHMiddle Aged-
dc.subject.MESHRadiology Information Systems-
dc.subject.MESHRetrospective Studies-
dc.subject.MESHSensitivity and Specificity-
dc.subject.MESHTomography, X-Ray Computed* / methods-
dc.subject.MESHTreatment Outcome-
dc.titleApplication of LI-RADS CT/MRI Radiation Treatment Response Assessment Version 2024: a study after transarterial radioembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Radiology (영상의학교실)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJaeseung Shin-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSunyoung Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJa Kyung Yoon-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKyowon Gu-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSun-Young Baek-
dc.contributor.googleauthorDong-Ho Hyun-
dc.contributor.googleauthorGyoung Min Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJong Yun Won-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11604-025-01785-7-
dc.contributor.localIdA00296-
dc.contributor.localIdA02443-
dc.contributor.localIdA05487-
dc.contributor.localIdA05659-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ04719-
dc.identifier.eissn1867-108X-
dc.identifier.pmid40238042-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11604-025-01785-7-
dc.subject.keywordLiver neoplasms-
dc.subject.keywordPosttreatment imaging-
dc.subject.keywordRadioembolization-
dc.subject.keywordResponse-
dc.subject.keywordSensitivity and specificity-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Gyoung Min-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor김경민-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor원종윤-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor윤자경-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor이선영-
dc.citation.volume43-
dc.citation.number9-
dc.citation.startPage1498-
dc.citation.endPage1508-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationJAPANESE JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, Vol.43(9) : 1498-1508, 2025-09-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Radiology (영상의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.