6 20

Cited 0 times in

Cited 0 times in

Patients with preoperative bone marrow oedema benefit more substantially from medial meniscus posterior root repair

Authors
 Byun, Junwoo  ;  Kim, Sung-Hwan  ;  Choi, Chong-Hyuk  ;  Jung, Min  ;  Chung, Kwangho  ;  Jung, Se-Han  ;  Lim, Jun-Young  ;  Moon, Hyun-Soo 
Citation
 KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, , 2025-07 
Journal Title
KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY
ISSN
 0942-2056 
Issue Date
2025-07
Keywords
bone marrow oedema ; functional improvement ; medial meniscus root tear ; surgical outcome
Abstract
PurposeTo analyze the clinical outcomes of the surgical repair of medial meniscus posterior root tear (MMRT) in patients with preoperative bone marrow oedema (BME).MethodsPatients who underwent arthroscopic pull-out repair for MMRT between 2010 and 2022 were retrospectively reviewed, and those with a minimum of two years of follow-up were included. The patients were then classified into two groups based on the presence of BME in the medial compartment of the knee on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (Group 1: patients without BME, Group 2: patients with BME). A comparative analysis was conducted for subjective and objective outcomes, including clinical scores and radiological parameters, at 2 years post-operatively and at the final follow-up. In particular, the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) values for both the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective and Lysholm scores were used to evaluate post-operative clinical improvement compared to preoperative baseline scores.ResultsA total of 95 patients were included (Group 1: 54 patients, mean follow-up 4.1 +/- 2.1 years; Group 2: 41 patients, mean follow-up 4.2 +/- 2.3 years). There were no significant differences in demographic and preoperative data, radiological parameters, or clinical scores at 2 years post-operatively or at the final follow-up. Similar results were observed consistently across subgroup analyses stratified by BME severity. However, the proportion of patients who achieved PASS, improvement beyond MCID at 2 years post-operatively, and SCB at the final follow-up for IKDC subjective score was significantly higher in Group 2 (p = 0.049, p = 0.047 and p = 0.038, respectively).ConclusionsPreoperative BME in patients undergoing surgical repair for MMRT did not appear to affect short- and mid-term outcomes but was indeed associated with a higher likelihood of functional improvement. Thus, preoperative BME need not be a concern in the surgical repair of MMRT.Level of EvidenceLevel III.
Files in This Item:
89528.pdf Download
DOI
10.1002/ksa.12792
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Orthopedic Surgery (정형외과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Kim, Sung Hwan(김성환) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5743-6241
Moon, Hyun-Soo(문현수)
Chung, Kwangho(정광호) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3097-3332
Jung, Min(정민) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7527-4802
Jung, Se-Han(정세한) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8422-093X
Choi, Chong Hyuk(최종혁) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9080-4904
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/207358
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links