Cited 0 times in

Choosing Wisely between Radiotherapy Dose-Fractionation Schedules: The Molecular Graded Prognostic Assessment for Elderly Glioblastoma Patients

Authors
 Hye In Lee  ;  Jina Kim  ;  In Ah Kim  ;  Joo Ho Lee  ;  Jaeho Cho  ;  Rifaquat Rahman  ;  Geoffrey Fell  ;  Chan Woo Wee  ;  Hong In Yoon 
Citation
 CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, Vol.57(2) : 378-386, 2025-04 
Journal Title
CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT
ISSN
 1598-2998 
Issue Date
2025-04
MeSH
Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Brain Neoplasms* / genetics ; Brain Neoplasms* / mortality ; Brain Neoplasms* / pathology ; Brain Neoplasms* / radiotherapy ; Brain Neoplasms* / therapy ; Chemoradiotherapy / methods ; Dose Fractionation, Radiation* ; Female ; Glioblastoma* / genetics ; Glioblastoma* / mortality ; Glioblastoma* / pathology ; Glioblastoma* / radiotherapy ; Glioblastoma* / therapy ; Humans ; Male ; Prognosis ; Retrospective Studies ; Temozolomide / therapeutic use ; Treatment Outcome
Keywords
Aged ; Glioblastoma ; Graded prognostic assessment ; Molecular biomarker ; Radiotherapy ; Temozolomide
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to develop a graded prognostic assessment (GPA) model integrating genomic characteristics for elderly patients with glioblastoma (eGBM), and to compare the efficacy of different radiotherapy schedules.

Materials and methods: This multi-institutional retrospective study included patients aged ≥ 65 years who underwent surgical resection followed by radiotherapy with or without temozolomide (TMZ) for newly diagnosed eGBM. Based on the significant factors identified in the multivariate analysis for overall survival (OS), the molecular GPA for eGBM (eGBM-molGPA) was established.

Results: A total of 334 and 239 patients who underwent conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT) and hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) were included, respectively, with 86% of patients receiving TMZ-based chemoradiation. With a median follow-up of 17.4 months (range, 3.3 to 149.9 months), the median OS was 18.7 months for CFRT+TMZ group, 15.1 months for HFRT+TMZ group, and 10.4 months for radiotherapy alone group (CFRT+TMZ vs. HFRT+TMZ: hazard ratio [HR], 1.52; p < 0.001 and CFRT+TMZ vs. radiotherapy alone: HR, 2.52; p < 0.001). In a combined analysis with the NOA-08 and Nordic trials, CFRT+TMZ group exhibited the highest survival rates among all treatment groups. The eGBM-molGPA, which integrated four clinical and three molecular parameters, stratified patients into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups. CFRT+TMZ significantly improved OS compared to HFRT+TMZ or radiotherapy alone in the low-risk (p=0.023) and intermediate-risk groups (p < 0.001). However, in the high-risk group, there was no significant difference in OS between treatment options (p=0.770).

Conclusion: CFRT+TMZ may be more effective than HFRT+TMZ or radiotherapy alone for selected eGBM patients. The novel eGBM-molGPA model can guide treatment selection for this patient population.
Files in This Item:
T202502283.pdf Download
DOI
10.4143/crt.2024.680
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Radiation Oncology (방사선종양학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Wee, Chan Woo(위찬우)
Yoon, Hong In(윤홍인) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2106-6856
Cho, Jae Ho(조재호) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9966-5157
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/205404
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links