Machine learning model of facial expression outperforms models using analgesia nociception index and vital signs to predict postoperative pain intensity: a pilot study

Abstract

Background: Few studies have evaluated the use of automated artificial intelligence (AI)based pain recognition in postoperative settings or the correlation with pain intensity. In this study, various machine learning (ML)-based models using facial expressions, the analgesia nociception index (ANI), and vital signs were developed to predict postoperative pain intensity, and their performances for predicting severe postoperative pain were compared. Methods: In total, 155 facial expressions from patients who underwent gastrectomy were recorded postoperatively; one blinded anesthesiologist simultaneously recorded the ANI score, vital signs, and patient self-assessed pain intensity based on the 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS). The ML models&apos; area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCs) were calculated and compared using DeLong&apos;s test. Results: ML models were constructed using facial expressions, ANI, vital signs, and different combinations of the three datasets. The ML model constructed using facial expressions best predicted an NRS >= 7 (AUROC 0.93) followed by the ML model combining facial expressions and vital signs (AUROC 0.84) in the test-set. ML models constructed using combined physiological signals (vital signs, ANI) performed better than models based on individual parameters for predicting NRS >= 7, although the AUROCs were inferior to those of the ML model based on facial expressions (all P < 0.05). Among these parameters, absolute and relative ANI had the worst AUROCs (0.69 and 0.68, respectively) for predict Conclusions: The ML model constructed using facial expressions best predicted severe postoperative pain (NRS >= 7) and outperformed models constructed from physiological signals.