0 182

Cited 37 times in

Cited 41 times in

Guiding Intervention for Complex Coronary Lesions by Optical Coherence Tomography or Intravascular Ultrasound

Authors
 Kang, Do-Yoon  ;  Ahn, Jung -Min  ;  Yun, Sung-Cheol  ;  Hur, Seung-Ho  ;  Cho, Yun-Kyeong  ;  Lee, Cheol Hyun  ;  Hong, Soon Jun  ;  Lim, Subin  ;  Kim, Sang-Wook  ;  Won, Hoyoun  ;  Oh, Jun-Hyok  ;  Choe, Jeong Cheon  ;  Hong, Young Joon  ;  Yoon, Yong-Hoon  ;  Kim, Hoyun  ;  Choi, Yeonwoo  ;  Lee, Jinho  ;  Yoon, Young Won  ;  Kim, Soo-Joong  ;  Bae, Jang-Ho  ;  Park, Seung-Jung  ;  Park, Duk-Woo 
Citation
 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, Vol.83(3) : 401-413, 2024-01 
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
ISSN
 0735-1097 
Issue Date
2024-01
Keywords
intracoronary imaging ; intravascular ultrasound ; optical coherent tomography ; percutaneous coronary intervention
Abstract
BACKGROUND Optical coherence tomography (OCT) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) have shown comparable outcomes in guiding percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, their comparative effectiveness in complex coronary artery lesions remains unclear. OBJECTIVES This study compared the effectiveness and safety of OCT-guided vs IVUS-guided PCI for complex coronary artery lesions. METHODS This was a prespecified, main subgroup analysis of complex coronary artery lesions in the OCTIVUS (Optical Coherence Tomography Versus Intravascular Ultrasound Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) trial, which included unprotected left main disease, bifurcation disease, an aorto-ostial lesion, a chronic total occlusion, a severely calcified lesion, an in-stent restenotic lesion, a diffuse long lesion, or multivessel PCI. The primary endpoint was a composite of death from cardiac causes, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization. RESULTS In 2,008 randomized patients, 1,475 (73.5%) underwent imaging -guided PCI for complex coronary artery lesions; 719 (48.7%) received OCT-guided and 756 (51.3%) IVUS-guided PCI. At a median follow-up of 2.0 years, primary endpoint event had occurred in 47 patients (6.5%) in the OCT-guided group and in 56 patients (7.4%) in the IVUS-guided group (HR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.59-1.29; P = 0.50). These findings were consistent in adjusted analyses. The incidence of contrast -induced nephropathy was similar between the 2 groups (1.9% vs 1.5%; P = 0.46). The incidence of major procedural complications was lower in the OCT-guided group than in the IVUS-guided group (1.7% vs 3.4%; P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS Among patients with complex coronary artery lesions, OCT-guided PCI showed a similar risk of primary composite event of death from cardiac causes, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization as compared with IVUS-guided PCI. (Optical Coherence Tomography Versus Intravascular Ultrasound Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [OCTIVUS]; NCT03394079) (J Am Coll Cardiol 2024;83:401-413) (c) 2024 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
DOI
10.1016/j.jacc.2023.10.017
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Yoon, Young Won(윤영원) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0907-0350
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/201860
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links