Cited 0 times in

Guiding Intervention for Complex Coronary Lesions by Optical Coherence Tomography or Intravascular Ultrasound

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author윤영원-
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-03T08:47:10Z-
dc.date.available2025-02-03T08:47:10Z-
dc.date.issued2024-01-
dc.identifier.issn0735-1097-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/201860-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Optical coherence tomography (OCT) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) have shown comparable outcomes in guiding percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, their comparative effectiveness in complex coronary artery lesions remains unclear. Objectives: This study compared the effectiveness and safety of OCT-guided vs IVUS-guided PCI for complex coronary artery lesions. Methods: This was a prespecified, main subgroup analysis of complex coronary artery lesions in the OCTIVUS (Optical Coherence Tomography Versus Intravascular Ultrasound Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) trial, which included unprotected left main disease, bifurcation disease, an aorto-ostial lesion, a chronic total occlusion, a severely calcified lesion, an in-stent restenotic lesion, a diffuse long lesion, or multivessel PCI. The primary endpoint was a composite of death from cardiac causes, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization. Results: In 2,008 randomized patients, 1,475 (73.5%) underwent imaging-guided PCI for complex coronary artery lesions; 719 (48.7%) received OCT-guided and 756 (51.3%) IVUS-guided PCI. At a median follow-up of 2.0 years, primary endpoint event had occurred in 47 patients (6.5%) in the OCT-guided group and in 56 patients (7.4%) in the IVUS-guided group (HR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.59-1.29; P = 0.50). These findings were consistent in adjusted analyses. The incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy was similar between the 2 groups (1.9% vs 1.5%; P = 0.46). The incidence of major procedural complications was lower in the OCT-guided group than in the IVUS-guided group (1.7% vs 3.4%; P = 0.03). Conclusions: Among patients with complex coronary artery lesions, OCT-guided PCI showed a similar risk of primary composite event of death from cardiac causes, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization as compared with IVUS-guided PCI. (Optical Coherence Tomography Versus Intravascular Ultrasound Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [OCTIVUS]; NCT03394079).-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityrestriction-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherElsevier Biomedical-
dc.relation.isPartOfJOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.subject.MESHCoronary Angiography / methods-
dc.subject.MESHCoronary Artery Disease* / diagnostic imaging-
dc.subject.MESHCoronary Artery Disease* / surgery-
dc.subject.MESHDrug-Eluting Stents* / adverse effects-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHMyocardial Infarction* / etiology-
dc.subject.MESHPercutaneous Coronary Intervention* / methods-
dc.subject.MESHTomography, Optical Coherence / methods-
dc.subject.MESHTreatment Outcome-
dc.subject.MESHUltrasonography, Interventional / methods-
dc.titleGuiding Intervention for Complex Coronary Lesions by Optical Coherence Tomography or Intravascular Ultrasound-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorDo-Yoon Kang-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJung-Min Ahn-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSung-Cheol Yun-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSeung-Ho Hur-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYun-Kyeong Cho-
dc.contributor.googleauthorCheol Hyun Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSoon Jun Hong-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSubin Lim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSang-Wook Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHoyoun Won-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJun-Hyok Oh-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJeong Cheon Choe-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYoung Joon Hong-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYong-Hoon Yoon-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHoyun Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYeonwoo Choi-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJinho Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYoung Won Yoon-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSoo-Joong Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJang-Ho Bae-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSeung-Jung Park-
dc.contributor.googleauthorDuk-Woo Park-
dc.contributor.googleauthorOCTIVUS Investigators-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jacc.2023.10.017-
dc.contributor.localIdA02580-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ01770-
dc.identifier.eissn1558-3597-
dc.identifier.pmid37879490-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0735-1097(23)07816-6-
dc.subject.keywordintracoronary imaging-
dc.subject.keywordintravascular ultrasound-
dc.subject.keywordoptical coherent tomography-
dc.subject.keywordpercutaneous coronary intervention-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameYoon, Young Won-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor윤영원-
dc.citation.volume83-
dc.citation.number3-
dc.citation.startPage401-
dc.citation.endPage413-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationJOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, Vol.83(3) : 401-413, 2024-01-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.