Cited 0 times in

Association of Delayed Denosumab Dosing with Increased Risk of Fractures: A Population-Based Retrospective Study

Authors
 Kyoung Min Kim  ;  Seol A Jang  ;  Nam Ki Hong  ;  Chul Sik Kim  ;  Yumie Rhee  ;  Seok Won Park  ;  Steven R Cummings  ;  Gi Hyeon Seo 
Citation
 Endocrinology and Metabolism (대한내분비학회지), Vol.39(6) : 946-955, 2024-12 
Journal Title
Endocrinology and Metabolism(대한내분비학회지)
ISSN
 2093-596X 
Issue Date
2024-12
MeSH
Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Bone Density Conservation Agents* / administration & dosage ; Denosumab* / administration & dosage ; Drug Administration Schedule ; Female ; Fractures, Bone / epidemiology ; Humans ; Incidence ; Middle Aged ; Osteoporosis / drug therapy ; Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal / drug therapy ; Osteoporotic Fractures / epidemiology ; Osteoporotic Fractures / prevention & control ; Republic of Korea / epidemiology ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors
Keywords
Denosumab ; Discontinuation ; Fractures ; Osteoporosis
Abstract
Backgruound: Inhibitory effects of denosumab on bone remodeling are reversible and disappear once treatment is discontinued. Herein, we examined whether and to what extent delayed denosumab administration is also associated with fracture risk using nation-wide data.

Methods: The study cohort included women aged 45 to 89 years who were started on denosumab for osteoporosis between October 2017 and December 2019 using data from the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment service. Participants were stratified according to the time of their subsequent denosumab administration from the last denosumab administration, including those with within 30 days early dosing (ED30), within the planned time of 180-210 days (referent), within 30-90 days of delayed dosing (DD90), within 90-180 days of delayed dosing (DD180), and longer than 181 days of delayed dosing (DD181+). The primary outcome was the incidence of all clinical fractures.

Results: A total of 149,199 participants included and 2,323 all clinical fractures (including 1,223 vertebral fractures) occurred. The incidence of all fractures was significantly higher in the DD90 compared to reference group (hazard ratio [HR], 1.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1 to 1.4). The risk of all fracture was even higher in the longer delayed DD180 group (HR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.6 to 2.3) and DD181+ group (HR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.5 to 2.2). Increased risks of fractures with delayed dosing were consistently observed for vertebral fractures.

Conclusion: Delayed denosumab dosing, even by 1 to 3 months, was significantly associated with increased fracture risk. Maintaining the correct dosing schedule should be emphasized when starting denosumab.
Files in This Item:
T992024940.pdf Download
DOI
10.3803/enm.2024.2047
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Kim, Kyung Min(김경민)
Kim, Chul Sik(김철식)
Park, Seok Won(박석원)
Rhee, Yumie(이유미) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4227-5638
Jang, Seol A(장슬아)
Hong, Nam Ki(홍남기) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8246-1956
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/201699
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links