67 249

Cited 0 times in

Cited 6 times in

2023 Survey on User Experience of Artificial Intelligence Software in Radiology by the Korean Society of Radiology

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorHwang, Eui Jin-
dc.contributor.authorPark, Ji Eun-
dc.contributor.authorSong, Kyoung Doo-
dc.contributor.authorYang, Dong Hyun-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Kyung Won-
dc.contributor.authorLee, June-Goo-
dc.contributor.authorYoon, Jung Hyun-
dc.contributor.authorHan, Kyunghwa-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Dong Hyun-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Hwiyoung-
dc.contributor.authorPark, Chang Min-
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-06T03:39:19Z-
dc.date.available2024-12-06T03:39:19Z-
dc.date.created2025-06-05-
dc.date.issued2024-07-
dc.identifier.issn1229-6929-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/201200-
dc.description.abstractObjective: In Korea, radiology has been positioned towards the early adoption of artificial intelligence -based software as medical devices (AI-SaMDs); however, little is known about the current usage, implementation, and future needs of AI-SaMDs. We surveyed the current trends and expectations for AI-SaMDs among members of the Korean Society of Radiology (KSR). Materials and Methods: An anonymous and voluntary online survey was open to all KSR members between April 17 and May 15, 2023. The survey was focused on the experiences of using AI-SaMDs, patterns of usage, levels of satisfaction, and expectations regarding the use of AI-SaMDs, including the roles of the industry, government, and KSR regarding the clinical use of AI-SaMDs. Results: Among the 370 respondents (response rate: 7.7% [370/4792]; 340 board -certified radiologists; 210 from academic institutions), 60.3% (223/370) had experience using AI-SaMDs. The two most common use -case of AI-SaMDs among the respondents were lesion detection (82.1%, 183/223), lesion diagnosis/classification (55.2%, 123/223), with the target imaging modalities being plain radiography (62.3%, 139/223), CT (42.6%, 95/223), mammography (29.1%, 65/223), and MRI (28.7%, 64/223). Most users were satisfied with AI-SaMDs (67.6% [115/170, for improvement of patient management] to 85.1% [189/222, for performance]). Regarding the expansion of clinical applications, most respondents expressed a preference for AI-SaMDs to assist in detection/diagnosis (77.0%, 285/370) and to perform automated measurement/quantification (63.5%, 235/370). Most respondents indicated that future development of AI-SaMDs should focus on improving practice efficiency (81.9%, 303/370) and quality (71.4%, 264/370). Overall, 91.9% of the respondents (340/370) agreed that there is a need for education or guidelines driven by the KSR regarding the use of AI-SaMDs. Conclusion: The penetration rate of AI-SaMDs in clinical practice and the corresponding satisfaction levels were high among members of the KSR. Most AI-SaMDs have been used for lesion detection, diagnosis, and classification. Most respondents requested KSR-driven education or guidelines on the use of AI-SaMDs.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherKorean Society of Radiology-
dc.relation.isPartOfKOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY-
dc.relation.isPartOfKOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.title2023 Survey on User Experience of Artificial Intelligence Software in Radiology by the Korean Society of Radiology-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Biomedical Systems Informatics (의생명시스템정보학교실)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHwang, Eui Jin-
dc.contributor.googleauthorPark, Ji Eun-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSong, Kyoung Doo-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYang, Dong Hyun-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, Kyung Won-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLee, June-Goo-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYoon, Jung Hyun-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHan, Kyunghwa-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, Dong Hyun-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, Hwiyoung-
dc.contributor.googleauthorPark, Chang Min-
dc.identifier.doi10.3348/kjr.2023.1246-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ02884-
dc.identifier.eissn2005-8330-
dc.identifier.pmid38942455-
dc.subject.keywordRadiology-
dc.subject.keywordArtificial intelligence-
dc.subject.keywordSurvey-
dc.subject.keywordMachine learning-
dc.subject.keywordMedical device-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Hwiyoung-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorYoon, Jung Hyun-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorHan, Kyunghwa-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Hwiyoung-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85197145978-
dc.identifier.wosid001257274700005-
dc.citation.volume25-
dc.citation.number7-
dc.citation.startPage613-
dc.citation.endPage622-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationKOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, Vol.25(7) : 613-622, 2024-07-
dc.identifier.rimsid86593-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorRadiology-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorArtificial intelligence-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorSurvey-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorMachine learning-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorMedical device-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.identifier.kciidART003089490-
dc.description.isOpenAccessN-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscie-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClasskci-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryRadiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaRadiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Radiology (영상의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Neurosurgery (신경외과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.