Cited 0 times in

Intraindividual comparison of prognostic imaging features of HCCs between MRIs with extracellular and hepatobiliary contrast agents

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author김도영-
dc.contributor.author김명진-
dc.contributor.author윤자경-
dc.contributor.author이선영-
dc.contributor.author최기홍-
dc.contributor.author최진영-
dc.contributor.author한대훈-
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-06T02:55:41Z-
dc.date.available2024-12-06T02:55:41Z-
dc.date.issued2024-10-
dc.identifier.issn1478-3223-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/200942-
dc.description.abstractBackground & aims: Accumulating evidence suggests that certain imaging features of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) may have prognostic implications. This study aimed to intraindividually compare MRIs with extracellular contrast agent (ECA-MRI) and hepatobiliary agent (HBA-MRI) for prognostic imaging features of HCC and to compare the prediction of microvascular invasion (MVI) and early recurrence between the two MRIs. Methods: The present study included 102 prospectively enrolled at-risk patients (median age, 61.0 years; 83 men) with surgically resected single HCC with both preoperative ECA-MRI and HBA-MRI between July 2019 and June 2023. The McNemar test was used to compare each prognostic imaging feature between the two MRIs. Significant imaging features associated with MVI were identified by multivariable logistic regression analysis, and early recurrence rates (<2 years) were compared between the two MRIs. Results: The frequencies of prognostic imaging features were not significantly different between the two MRIs (p = .07 to >.99). Non-smooth tumour margin (ECA-MRI, odds ratio [OR] = 5.30; HBA-MRI, OR = 7.07) and peritumoral arterial phase hyperenhancement (ECA-MRI, OR = 4.26; HBA-MRI, OR = 4.43) were independent factors significantly associated with MVI on both MRIs. Two-trait predictor of venous invasion (presence of internal arteries and absence of hypoattenuating halo) on ECA-MRI (OR = 11.24) and peritumoral HBP hypointensity on HBA-MRI (OR = 20.42) were other predictors of MVI. Early recurrence rates of any two or more significant imaging features (49.8% on ECA-MRI vs 51.3% on HBA-MRI, p = .75) were not significantly different between the two MRIs. Conclusion: Prognostic imaging features of HCC may be comparable between ECA-MRI and HBA-MRI.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityrestriction-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell-
dc.relation.isPartOfLIVER INTERNATIONAL-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.subject.MESHAged-
dc.subject.MESHCarcinoma, Hepatocellular* / diagnostic imaging-
dc.subject.MESHCarcinoma, Hepatocellular* / pathology-
dc.subject.MESHCarcinoma, Hepatocellular* / surgery-
dc.subject.MESHContrast Media*-
dc.subject.MESHFemale-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHLiver Neoplasms* / diagnostic imaging-
dc.subject.MESHLiver Neoplasms* / pathology-
dc.subject.MESHLiver Neoplasms* / surgery-
dc.subject.MESHMagnetic Resonance Imaging* / methods-
dc.subject.MESHMale-
dc.subject.MESHMiddle Aged-
dc.subject.MESHNeoplasm Invasiveness-
dc.subject.MESHNeoplasm Recurrence, Local / diagnostic imaging-
dc.subject.MESHPrognosis-
dc.subject.MESHProspective Studies-
dc.titleIntraindividual comparison of prognostic imaging features of HCCs between MRIs with extracellular and hepatobiliary contrast agents-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJa Kyung Yoon-
dc.contributor.googleauthorDai Hoon Han-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSunyoung Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJin-Young Choi-
dc.contributor.googleauthorGi Hong Choi-
dc.contributor.googleauthorDo Young Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMyeong-Jin Kim-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/liv.16059-
dc.contributor.localIdA00385-
dc.contributor.localIdA00426-
dc.contributor.localIdA05487-
dc.contributor.localIdA05659-
dc.contributor.localIdA04046-
dc.contributor.localIdA04200-
dc.contributor.localIdA04273-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ02171-
dc.identifier.eissn1478-3231-
dc.identifier.pmid39105495-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/liv.16059-
dc.subject.keywordcontrast media-
dc.subject.keywordhepatocellular carcinoma-
dc.subject.keywordmagnetic resonance imaging-
dc.subject.keywordprognosis-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Do Young-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor김도영-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor김명진-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor윤자경-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor이선영-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor최기홍-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor최진영-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor한대훈-
dc.citation.volume44-
dc.citation.number10-
dc.citation.startPage2847-
dc.citation.endPage2857-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationLIVER INTERNATIONAL, Vol.44(10) : 2847-2857, 2024-10-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Radiology (영상의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Surgery (외과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.