Cited 1 times in

Influence of postprinting cleaning methods on the cleaning efficiency and surface and mechanical properties of three-dimensionally printed resins

Authors
 Ok Hyung Nam  ;  Sang-Yeop Chung  ;  Hong-Keun Hyun  ;  Ju Ri Ye  ;  Yuwon Jeong  ;  Seo-Eun Oh  ;  Yong Kwon Chae  ;  Hyeonjong Lee 
Citation
 JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, Vol.132(4) : 838.e1-838.e9, 2024-10 
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY
ISSN
 0022-3913 
Issue Date
2024-10
MeSH
2-Propanol ; Dental Materials / chemistry ; Flexural Strength ; Hardness ; Humans ; In Vitro Techniques ; Materials Testing* ; Polymerization ; Printing, Three-Dimensional* ; Surface Properties* ; X-Ray Microtomography
Abstract
Statement of problem: The outcome of photopolymerized 3-dimensional (3D) printing is influenced by the methods used for postprinting cleaning, yet information on postprinting cleaning is sparse.

Purpose: The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess the cleaning efficiency and surface and mechanical properties of 3D printed resin according to postprinting cleaning methods.

Material and methods: Specimens were fabricated from a 3D model using resin materials (NextDent C&B MFH and DIOnavi-P. MAX) and were tested for postprinting cleaning methods for 5 minutes with isopropyl alcohol, isopropyl alcohol + ultrasonic, ethyl alcohol, ethyl alcohol + ultrasonic, and ultrasonic alone. Postpolymerization was followed for 5 minutes. The cleaning efficiency, microcomputed tomography (µCT), surface roughness, Vickers hardness, and flexural strength of the specimens were evaluated. The 1-way ANOVA test was performed after considering normality. A post hoc analysis with Bonferroni was also performed (α=.008 or.005).

Results: Ultrasonic in addition to cleaning solutions significantly improved the cleaning efficiency in NextDent C&B MFH specimens (P<.005), whereas ultrasonic did not affect the efficiency in DIOnavi-P. MAX specimens. No significant differences were found in surface roughness by postprinting cleaning methods in either NextDent C&B MFH or DIOnavi-P. MAX (P>.005). No significant changes in surface hardness were observed by postprinting cleaning methods (P>.008). In the NextDent C&B MFH, ethyl alcohol + ultrasonic significantly decreased the flexural strength (P<.005). There were no significant differences in the flexural strength in the DIOnavi-P. MAX (P>.005).

Conclusions: Ethyl alcohol was comparable with isopropyl alcohol for use as a postprinting cleaning solution for both NextDent C&B MFH and DIOnavi-P. MAX. The addition of ultrasonic to cleaning solutions should be applied with caution. These findings suggest that different postprinting cleaning methods can be recommended depending on the 3D printed resin materials.
Full Text
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022391324001513
DOI
10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.02.026
Appears in Collections:
2. College of Dentistry (치과대학) > Dept. of Prosthodontics (보철과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Lee, Hyeonjong(이현종) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1669-2975
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/200642
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links