Cited 1 times in

Influence of postprinting cleaning methods on the cleaning efficiency and surface and mechanical properties of three-dimensionally printed resins

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author이현종-
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-06T01:56:13Z-
dc.date.available2024-12-06T01:56:13Z-
dc.date.issued2024-10-
dc.identifier.issn0022-3913-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/200642-
dc.description.abstractStatement of problem: The outcome of photopolymerized 3-dimensional (3D) printing is influenced by the methods used for postprinting cleaning, yet information on postprinting cleaning is sparse. Purpose: The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess the cleaning efficiency and surface and mechanical properties of 3D printed resin according to postprinting cleaning methods. Material and methods: Specimens were fabricated from a 3D model using resin materials (NextDent C&B MFH and DIOnavi-P. MAX) and were tested for postprinting cleaning methods for 5 minutes with isopropyl alcohol, isopropyl alcohol + ultrasonic, ethyl alcohol, ethyl alcohol + ultrasonic, and ultrasonic alone. Postpolymerization was followed for 5 minutes. The cleaning efficiency, microcomputed tomography (µCT), surface roughness, Vickers hardness, and flexural strength of the specimens were evaluated. The 1-way ANOVA test was performed after considering normality. A post hoc analysis with Bonferroni was also performed (α=.008 or.005). Results: Ultrasonic in addition to cleaning solutions significantly improved the cleaning efficiency in NextDent C&B MFH specimens (P<.005), whereas ultrasonic did not affect the efficiency in DIOnavi-P. MAX specimens. No significant differences were found in surface roughness by postprinting cleaning methods in either NextDent C&B MFH or DIOnavi-P. MAX (P>.005). No significant changes in surface hardness were observed by postprinting cleaning methods (P>.008). In the NextDent C&B MFH, ethyl alcohol + ultrasonic significantly decreased the flexural strength (P<.005). There were no significant differences in the flexural strength in the DIOnavi-P. MAX (P>.005). Conclusions: Ethyl alcohol was comparable with isopropyl alcohol for use as a postprinting cleaning solution for both NextDent C&B MFH and DIOnavi-P. MAX. The addition of ultrasonic to cleaning solutions should be applied with caution. These findings suggest that different postprinting cleaning methods can be recommended depending on the 3D printed resin materials.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityrestriction-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherMosby-Year Book-
dc.relation.isPartOfJOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.subject.MESH2-Propanol-
dc.subject.MESHDental Materials / chemistry-
dc.subject.MESHFlexural Strength-
dc.subject.MESHHardness-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHIn Vitro Techniques-
dc.subject.MESHMaterials Testing*-
dc.subject.MESHPolymerization-
dc.subject.MESHPrinting, Three-Dimensional*-
dc.subject.MESHSurface Properties*-
dc.subject.MESHX-Ray Microtomography-
dc.titleInfluence of postprinting cleaning methods on the cleaning efficiency and surface and mechanical properties of three-dimensionally printed resins-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Dentistry (치과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Prosthodontics (보철과학교실)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorOk Hyung Nam-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSang-Yeop Chung-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHong-Keun Hyun-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJu Ri Ye-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYuwon Jeong-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSeo-Eun Oh-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYong Kwon Chae-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHyeonjong Lee-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.02.026-
dc.contributor.localIdA06238-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ01718-
dc.identifier.eissn1097-6841-
dc.identifier.pmid38582709-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022391324001513-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameLee, Hyeonjong-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor이현종-
dc.citation.volume132-
dc.citation.number4-
dc.citation.startPage838.e1-
dc.citation.endPage838.e9-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationJOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, Vol.132(4) : 838.e1-838.e9, 2024-10-
Appears in Collections:
2. College of Dentistry (치과대학) > Dept. of Prosthodontics (보철과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.