0 243

Cited 0 times in

Cited 2 times in

Deep learning proton beam range estimation model for quality assurance based on two-dimensional scintillated light distributions in simulations

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorLee, Eunho-
dc.contributor.authorCho, Byungchul-
dc.contributor.authorKwak, Jungwon-
dc.contributor.authorJeong, Chiyoung-
dc.contributor.authorPark, Min-Jae-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Sung-woo-
dc.contributor.authorSong, Si Yeol-
dc.contributor.authorGoh, Youngmoon-
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-30T06:47:07Z-
dc.date.available2024-05-30T06:47:07Z-
dc.date.created2024-04-17-
dc.date.issued2023-11-
dc.identifier.issn0094-2405-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/199332-
dc.description.abstractBackgroundMany studies have utilized optical camera systems with volumetric scintillators for quality assurances (QA) to estimate the proton beam range. However, previous analytically driven range estimation methods have the difficulty to derive the dose distributions from the scintillation images with quenching and optical effects. PurposeIn this study, a deep learning method utilized to QA was used to predict the beam range and spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP) for two-dimensional (2D) map conversion from the scintillation light distribution (LD) into the dose distribution in a water phantom. MethodsThe 2D residual U-net modeling for deep learning was used to predict the 2D water dose map from a 2D scintillation LD map. Monte Carlo simulations for dataset preparation were performed with varying monoenergetic proton beam energies, field sizes, and beam axis shifts. The LD was reconstructed using photons backpropagated from the aperture as a virtual lens. The SOBP samples were constructed based on monoenergetic dose distributions. The training set, including the validation set, consisted of 8659 image pairs of LD and water dose maps. After training, dose map prediction was performed using a 300 image pair test set generated under random conditions. The pairs of simulated and predicted dose maps were analyzed by Bragg peak fitting and gamma index maps to evaluate the model prediction. ResultThe estimated beam range and SOBP width resolutions were 0.02 and 0.19 mm respectively for varying beam conditions, and the beam range and SOBP width deviations from the reference simulation result were less than 0.1 and 0.8 mm respectively. The simulated and predicted distributions showed good agreement in the gamma analysis, except for rare cases with failed gamma indices in the proximal and field-marginal regions. ConclusionThe deep learning conversion method using scintillation LDs in an optical camera system with a scintillator is feasible for estimating proton beam range and SOBP width with high accuracy.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityrestriction-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherPublished for the American Assn. of Physicists in Medicine by the American Institute of Physics.-
dc.relation.isPartOfMEDICAL PHYSICS-
dc.relation.isPartOfMEDICAL PHYSICS-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.titleDeep learning proton beam range estimation model for quality assurance based on two-dimensional scintillated light distributions in simulations-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Radiation Oncology (방사선종양학교실)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLee, Eunho-
dc.contributor.googleauthorCho, Byungchul-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKwak, Jungwon-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJeong, Chiyoung-
dc.contributor.googleauthorPark, Min-Jae-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, Sung-woo-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSong, Si Yeol-
dc.contributor.googleauthorGoh, Youngmoon-
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/mp.16646-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ02206-
dc.identifier.eissn2473-4209-
dc.identifier.pmid37517077-
dc.subject.keywordBragg peak-
dc.subject.keyworddeep learning-
dc.subject.keywordMonte Carlo simulation-
dc.subject.keywordresidual U-net-
dc.subject.keywordscintillation-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorLee, Eunho-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85166398483-
dc.identifier.wosid001036782300001-
dc.citation.volume50-
dc.citation.number11-
dc.citation.startPage7203-
dc.citation.endPage7213-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationMEDICAL PHYSICS, Vol.50(11) : 7203-7213, 2023-11-
dc.identifier.rimsid83169-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorBragg peak-
dc.subject.keywordAuthordeep learning-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorMonte Carlo simulation-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorresidual U-net-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorscintillation-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPLASTIC SCINTILLATOR-
dc.subject.keywordPlusTHERAPY-
dc.subject.keywordPlusTOPAS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusTOOL-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.description.isOpenAccessN-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscie-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryRadiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaRadiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging-
Appears in Collections:
7. Others (기타) > Others (기타) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.