0 147

Cited 0 times in

Rethinking extent of resection of contrast-enhancing and non-enhaning tumor: different survival impacts on adult-type diffuse gliomas in 2021 World Health Organization classification

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author강석구-
dc.contributor.author김세훈-
dc.contributor.author김의현-
dc.contributor.author김진아-
dc.contributor.author문주형-
dc.contributor.author박예원-
dc.contributor.author안성수-
dc.contributor.author이승구-
dc.contributor.author장종희-
dc.contributor.author한경화-
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-22T07:04:17Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-22T07:04:17Z-
dc.date.issued2024-02-
dc.identifier.issn0938-7994-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/198674-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Extent of resection (EOR) of contrast-enhancing (CE) and non-enhancing (NE) tumors may have different impacts on survival according to types of adult-type diffuse gliomas in the molecular era. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of EOR of CE and NE tumors in glioma according to the 2021 World Health Organization classification. Methods: This retrospective study included 1193 adult-type diffuse glioma patients diagnosed between 2001 and 2021 (183 oligodendroglioma, 211 isocitrate dehydrogenase [IDH]–mutant astrocytoma, and 799 IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients) from a single institution. Patients had complete information on IDH mutation, 1p/19q codeletion, and O6-methylguanine-methyltransferase (MGMT) status. Cox survival analyses were performed within each glioma type to assess predictors of overall survival, including clinical, imaging data, histological grade, MGMT status, adjuvant treatment, and EOR of CE and NE tumors. Subgroup analyses were performed in patients with CE tumor. Results: Among 1193 patients, 935 (78.4%) patients had CE tumors. In entire oligodendrogliomas, gross total resection (GTR) of NE tumor was not associated with survival (HR = 0.56, p = 0.223). In 86 (47.0%) oligodendroglioma patients with CE tumor, GTR of CE tumor was the only independent predictor of survival (HR = 0.16, p = 0.004) in multivariable analysis. GTR of CE and NE tumors was independently associated with better survival in IDH-mutant astrocytoma and IDH-wildtype glioblastoma (all ps < 0.05). Conclusions: GTR of both CE and NE tumors may significantly improve survival within IDH-mutant astrocytomas and IDH-wildtype glioblastomas. In oligodendrogliomas, the EOR of CE tumor may be crucial in survival; aggressive GTR of NE tumor may be unnecessary, whereas GTR of the CE tumor is recommended. Clinical relevance statement: Surgical strategies on contrast-enhancing (CE) and non-enhancing (NE) tumors should be reassessed considering the different survival outcomes after gross total resection depending on CE and NE tumors in the 2021 World Health Organization classification of adult-type diffuse gliomas.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityrestriction-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherSpringer International-
dc.relation.isPartOfEUROPEAN RADIOLOGY-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.subject.MESHAdult-
dc.subject.MESHAstrocytoma*-
dc.subject.MESHBrain Neoplasms* / diagnostic imaging-
dc.subject.MESHBrain Neoplasms* / genetics-
dc.subject.MESHBrain Neoplasms* / surgery-
dc.subject.MESHGlioblastoma*-
dc.subject.MESHGlioma* / diagnostic imaging-
dc.subject.MESHGlioma* / genetics-
dc.subject.MESHGlioma* / surgery-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHIsocitrate Dehydrogenase / genetics-
dc.subject.MESHMutation-
dc.subject.MESHOligodendroglioma*-
dc.subject.MESHRetrospective Studies-
dc.subject.MESHWorld Health Organization-
dc.titleRethinking extent of resection of contrast-enhancing and non-enhaning tumor: different survival impacts on adult-type diffuse gliomas in 2021 World Health Organization classification-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Neurosurgery (신경외과학교실)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYae Won Park-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSooyon Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKyunghwa Han-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSung Soo Ahn-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJu Hyung Moon-
dc.contributor.googleauthorEui Hyun Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJinna Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSeok-Gu Kang-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSe Hoon Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSeung-Koo Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJong Hee Chang-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00330-023-10125-0-
dc.contributor.localIdA00036-
dc.contributor.localIdA00610-
dc.contributor.localIdA00837-
dc.contributor.localIdA01022-
dc.contributor.localIdA01383-
dc.contributor.localIdA05330-
dc.contributor.localIdA02234-
dc.contributor.localIdA02912-
dc.contributor.localIdA03470-
dc.contributor.localIdA04267-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ00851-
dc.identifier.eissn1432-1084-
dc.identifier.pmid37608093-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00330-023-10125-0-
dc.subject.keywordExtent of resection-
dc.subject.keywordGlioma-
dc.subject.keywordMagnetic resonance imaging-
dc.subject.keywordMolecular diagnostics-
dc.subject.keywordSurvival-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKang, Seok Gu-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor강석구-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor김세훈-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor김의현-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor김진아-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor문주형-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor박예원-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor안성수-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor이승구-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor장종희-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor한경화-
dc.citation.volume34-
dc.citation.number2-
dc.citation.startPage1376-
dc.citation.endPage1387-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationEUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, Vol.34(2) : 1376-1387, 2024-02-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Neurosurgery (신경외과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Pathology (병리학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Radiology (영상의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.