170 412

Cited 0 times in

Cited 6 times in

Assessment of deep learning-based auto-contouring on interobserver consistency in target volume and organs-at-risk delineation for breast cancer: Implications for RTQA program in a multi-institutional study

Authors
 Choi, Min Seo  ;  Chang, Jee Suk  ;  Kim, Kyubo  ;  Kim, Jin Hee  ;  Kim, Tae Hyung  ;  Kim, Sungmin  ;  Cha, Hyejung  ;  Cho, Oyeon  ;  Choi, Jin Hwa  ;  Kim, Myungsoo  ;  Kim, Juree  ;  Kim, Tae Gyu  ;  Yeo, Seung-Gu  ;  Chang, Ah Ram  ;  Ahn, Sung-Ja  ;  Choi, Jinhyun  ;  Kang, Ki Mun  ;  Kwon, Jeanny  ;  Koo, Taeryool  ;  Kim, Mi Young  ;  Choi, Seo Hee  ;  Jeong, Bae Kwon  ;  Jang, Bum-Sup  ;  Jo, In Young  ;  Lee, Hyebin  ;  Kim, Nalee  ;  Park, Hae Jin  ;  Im, Jung Ho  ;  Lee, Sea-Won  ;  Cho, Yeona  ;  Lee, Sun Young  ;  Chang, Ji Hyun  ;  Chun, Jaehee  ;  Lee, Eung Man  ;  Kim, Jin Sung  ;  Shin, Kyung Hwan  ;  Kim, Yong Bae 
Citation
 BREAST, Vol.73, 2024-02 
Article Number
 103599 
Journal Title
BREAST
ISSN
 0960-9776 
Issue Date
2024-02
Keywords
RTQA ; Inter-observer variation ; Auto-contouring ; Breast cancer ; Deep learning
Abstract
Purpose: To quantify interobserver variation (IOV) in target volume and organs-at-risk (OAR) contouring across 31 institutions in breast cancer cases and to explore the clinical utility of deep learning (DL)-based auto -contouring in reducing potential IOV.Methods and materials: In phase 1, two breast cancer cases were randomly selected and distributed to multiple institutions for contouring six clinical target volumes (CTVs) and eight OAR. In Phase 2, auto-contour sets were generated using a previously published DL Breast segmentation model and were made available for all participants. The difference in IOV of submitted contours in phases 1 and 2 was investigated quantitatively using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and Hausdorff distance (HD). The qualitative analysis involved using contour heat maps to visualize the extent and location of these variations and the required modification.Results: Over 800 pairwise comparisons were analysed for each structure in each case. Quantitative phase 2 metrics showed significant improvement in the mean DSC (from 0.69 to 0.77) and HD (from 34.9 to 17.9 mm). Quantitative analysis showed increased interobserver agreement in phase 2, specifically for CTV structures (5-19 %), leading to fewer manual adjustments. Underlying IOV differences causes were reported using a questionnaire and hierarchical clustering analysis based on the volume of CTVs.Conclusion: DL-based auto-contours improved the contour agreement for OARs and CTVs significantly, both qualitatively and quantitatively, suggesting its potential role in minimizing radiation therapy protocol deviation.
DOI
10.1016/j.breast.2023.103599
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Radiation Oncology (방사선종양학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Kim, Yong Bae(김용배) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7573-6862
Kim, Jinsung(김진성) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1415-6471
Chang, Jee Suk(장지석) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7685-3382
Cho, Yeona(조연아) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1202-0880
Choi, Seo Hee(최서희) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4083-6414
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/198133
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links