0 86

Cited 0 times in

Noninvasive hemoglobin monitoring for maintaining hemoglobin concentration within the target range during major noncardiac surgery: A randomized controlled trial

Authors
 Sun-Kyung Park  ;  Chahnmee Hur  ;  Young-Won Kim  ;  Seokha Yoo  ;  Young-Jin Lim  ;  Jin-Tae Kim 
Citation
 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, Vol.93 : 111326, 2024-05 
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA
ISSN
 0952-8180 
Issue Date
2024-05
MeSH
Blood Loss, Surgical / prevention & control ; Hemoglobins / analysis ; Humans ; Monitoring, Intraoperative* / methods ; Oximetry* / methods ; Prospective Studies
Keywords
Blood loss ; Blood transfusion ; Hemoglobins ; Noncardiac surgery ; Noninvasive hemoglobin monitoring ; Surgical
Abstract
Study objective: The effect of noninvasive CO-oximetry hemoglobin (SpHb) monitoring on the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing surgery remains unclear. This trial aimed to evaluate whether SpHb monitoring helps maintain hemoglobin levels within a predefined target range during major noncardiac surgeries with a potential risk of intraoperative hemorrhage. Design: A single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial. Setting: University hospital. Patients: One hundred and thirty patients undergoing elective noncardiac surgery with a potential risk of hemorrhage. Interventions: Patients were randomly allocated to undergo either SpHb-guided management (SpHb group) or usual care (control group). Measurements: The primary outcome was the rate of deviation of the total hemoglobin concentration (determined from laboratory testing) from a pre-specified target range (8–14 g/dL). This was defined as the number of laboratory tests revealing such deviations divided by the total number of laboratory tests performed during the surgery. Main results: The primary outcome occurred significantly less frequently in the SpHb group as compared to that in the control group (15/555 [2.7%]) vs. 68/598 [11.4%]; relative risk, 0.24; 95% confidence interval, 0.13–0.41; P < 0.001). Fewer point-of-care blood tests were performed in the SpHb group than in the control group (median [interquartile range], 2 [1–4] vs. 4 [2–5]; P < 0.001). There were no significant intergroup differences in the number of patients who received red blood cell transfusions during surgery (SpHb vs. control, 33.8% vs. 46.2%; P = 0.201). The incidence of unnecessary red blood cell preparation (>2 units) was lower in the SpHb group than in the control group (3.1% vs. 16.9%; P = 0.024). Conclusions: Compared with routine care, SpHb-guided management resulted in significantly lower rates of hemoglobin deviation outside the target range intraoperatively in patients undergoing major noncardiac surgeries with a potential risk of hemorrhage. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT03816514). © 2023 Elsevier Inc.
Full Text
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952818023002763
DOI
10.1016/j.jclinane.2023.111326
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (마취통증의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Kim, Youngwon(김영원)
Park, Sun-Kyung(박선경)
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/198128
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links