0 394

Cited 0 times in

Cited 4 times in

Noninvasive hemoglobin monitoring for maintaining hemoglobin concentration within the target range during major noncardiac surgery: A randomized controlled trial

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorPark, Sun-Kyung-
dc.contributor.authorHur, Chahnmee-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Young-Won-
dc.contributor.authorYoo, Seokha-
dc.contributor.authorLim, Young-Jin-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Jin-Tae-
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-22T05:36:58Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-22T05:36:58Z-
dc.date.created2024-04-05-
dc.date.issued2024-05-
dc.identifier.issn0952-8180-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/198128-
dc.description.abstractStudy objective: The effect of noninvasive CO-oximetry hemoglobin (SpHb) monitoring on the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing surgery remains unclear. This trial aimed to evaluate whether SpHb monitoring helps maintain hemoglobin levels within a predefined target range during major noncardiac surgeries with a potential risk of intraoperative hemorrhage.Design: A single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial. Setting: University hospital. Patients: One hundred and thirty patients undergoing elective noncardiac surgery with a potential risk of hemorrhage.Interventions: Patients were randomly allocated to undergo either SpHb-guided management (SpHb group) or usual care (control group).Measurements: The primary outcome was the rate of deviation of the total hemoglobin concentration (determined from laboratory testing) from a pre-specified target range (8-14 g/dL). This was defined as the number of laboratory tests revealing such deviations divided by the total number of laboratory tests performed during the surgery.Main results: The primary outcome occurred significantly less frequently in the SpHb group as compared to that in the control group (15/555 [2.7%]) vs. 68/598 [11.4%]; relative risk, 0.24; 95% confidence interval, 0.13-0.41; P < 0.001). Fewer point-of-care blood tests were performed in the SpHb group than in the control group (median [interquartile range], 2 [1-4] vs. 4 [2-5]; P < 0.001). There were no significant intergroup differences in the number of patients who received red blood cell transfusions during surgery (SpHb vs. control, 33.8% vs. 46.2%; P = 0.201). The incidence of unnecessary red blood cell preparation (>2 units) was lower in the SpHb group than in the control group (3.1% vs. 16.9%; P = 0.024).Conclusions: Compared with routine care, SpHb-guided management resulted in significantly lower rates of hemoglobin deviation outside the target range intraoperatively in patients undergoing major noncardiac surgeries with a potential risk of hemorrhage.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityrestriction-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.relation.isPartOfJOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA-
dc.relation.isPartOfJOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.titleNoninvasive hemoglobin monitoring for maintaining hemoglobin concentration within the target range during major noncardiac surgery: A randomized controlled trial-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (마취통증의학교실)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorPark, Sun-Kyung-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHur, Chahnmee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, Young-Won-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYoo, Seokha-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLim, Young-Jin-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, Jin-Tae-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jclinane.2023.111326-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ01315-
dc.identifier.eissn1873-4529-
dc.identifier.pmid37988814-
dc.subject.keywordBlood loss-
dc.subject.keywordSurgical-
dc.subject.keywordBlood transfusion-
dc.subject.keywordHemoglobins-
dc.subject.keywordNoncardiac surgery-
dc.subject.keywordNoninvasive hemoglobin monitoring-
dc.contributor.alternativeNamePark, Sun-Kyung-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorPark, Sun-Kyung-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Young-Won-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85177203352-
dc.identifier.wosid001123902800001-
dc.citation.volume93-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationJOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, Vol.93, 2024-05-
dc.identifier.rimsid82832-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorBlood loss-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorSurgical-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorBlood transfusion-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorHemoglobins-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorNoncardiac surgery-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorNoninvasive hemoglobin monitoring-
dc.subject.keywordPlusBLOOD-CELL TRANSFUSION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPREOPERATIVE ANEMIA-
dc.subject.keywordPlusMANAGEMENT-
dc.subject.keywordPlusHEMOCUE(R)-
dc.subject.keywordPlusACCURACY-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.description.isOpenAccessN-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscie-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryAnesthesiology-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaAnesthesiology-
dc.identifier.articleno111326-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (마취통증의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.