Factors influencing the successful eruption of the maxillary third molar after extraction of the maxillary second molar

Abstract

Introduction: This study evaluated the occlusal status of the maxillary third molars that erupted spontaneously after extraction of the maxillary second molars and investigated the factors that influenced the occlusal status of the maxillary third molars. Methods: We assessed 136 maxillary third molars in 87 patients. Alignment, marginal ridge discrepancy, occlusal contact, interproximal contact, and buccal overjet were used to score the occlusal status. Occlusal status was classified as good (G group), acceptable (A group), and poor (P group) for the maxillary third molar at its full eruption (T1). The Nolla's stage, long axis angle, the vertical and horizontal position of the maxillary third molar, and the maxillary tuberosity space were assessed at the time of maxillary second molar extraction (T0) and T1 to identify factors influencing the eruption of the maxillary third molar. Results: G, A, and P groups comprised 47.8%, 17.6,% and 34.6% of the sample, respectively. Age was the lowest in the G group at both T0 and T1. The maxillary tuberosity space at T1 and the amount of the change of maxillary tuberosity space were the largest in the G group. There was a significant difference in the distribution of the Nolla's stage at T0. The proportions of the G group were 60.0% in stage 4, 46.8% in stages 5 and 6, 70.4% in stage 7, and 15.0% in stages 8-10. According to multiple logistic regression analysis, stages 8-10 for the maxillary third molar at T0 and the amount of the change of maxillary tuberosity were negatively associated with the G group. Conclusions: Good-to-acceptable occlusion was seen in 65.4% of the maxillary third molars after maxillary second molar extraction. Insufficient increase in the maxillary tuberosity space and Nolla stage 8 or higher at T0 negatively influenced the maxillary third molar eruption. (Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2023;164:636-45)