0 182

Cited 0 times in

Effect of High-Versus Low-Frequency of Abdominopelvic Computed Tomography Follow-Up Testing on Overall Survival in Patients With Stage II Or III Colon Cancer

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author김한상-
dc.contributor.author김현욱-
dc.contributor.author신상준-
dc.contributor.author안중배-
dc.contributor.author임준석-
dc.contributor.author장지석-
dc.contributor.author한대훈-
dc.contributor.author한윤대-
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-28T03:06:38Z-
dc.date.available2023-11-28T03:06:38Z-
dc.date.issued2023-09-
dc.identifier.issn1533-0028-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/196733-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Intensive surveillance of colon cancer by using the abdominopelvic computed tomography (AP-CT) is common in real world practice; however, it is still unclear whether high-frequency surveillance using AP-CT in patients with these risk factors is superior to that in the low-frequency surveillance. Patients and methods: We retrospectively reviewed 1803 patients with stage II-III colon cancer receiving curative surgery between January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2015. We evaluated the average scan-to-scan intervals of postoperative AP-CT testing and assigned patients with an interval of 5 to 8 and 9 to 13 months to the high-frequency (HF) and low-frequency (LF) groups, respectively. The cutoff value of preoperative and postoperative CEA levels was 5 ng/mL. We also applied propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability of treatment weighting to adjust clinicopathologic differences between the 2 groups. Results: We matched 1:1 for each surveillance group yielding a cohort of 776 matched patients. After PSM, Baseline demographics were overall well balanced between 2 groups. Stage III (OR, 2.00; 95% Confidence interval [CI], 1.21-3.30) and postoperative CEA elevation (OR, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.08-4.92) were independent risk factors of recurrence in multivariate analyses. Patient in the HF group had more surgery plus chemo- or radiotherapy as postrecurrence treatment than patient in the LF group (46.2% vs. 23.1%, P = .017). This trend was retained after PSM, although it is not significant (44.4% vs. 23.1%, P = .060). However, survival outcomes of high-frequency AP-CT surveillance were not superior to those of low-frequency surveillance in all subgroups, including stage III (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.40-2.47) and postoperative CEA elevation (HR 1.36, 95% CI 0.45-4.11). Conclusion: High-frequency AP-CT testing is associated with a higher proportion of surgery plus chemo- or radiotherapy as postrecurrence treatment, without improvement in 6-year overall survival.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityrestriction-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.relation.isPartOfCLINICAL COLORECTAL CANCER-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.subject.MESHColonic Neoplasms* / diagnostic imaging-
dc.subject.MESHColonic Neoplasms* / pathology-
dc.subject.MESHColonic Neoplasms* / therapy-
dc.subject.MESHFollow-Up Studies-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHNeoplasm Staging-
dc.subject.MESHRetrospective Studies-
dc.subject.MESHTomography, X-Ray Computed-
dc.titleEffect of High-Versus Low-Frequency of Abdominopelvic Computed Tomography Follow-Up Testing on Overall Survival in Patients With Stage II Or III Colon Cancer-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJeongseok Jeon-
dc.contributor.googleauthorDa Bin Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSang Joon Shin-
dc.contributor.googleauthorDai Hoon Han-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJee Suk Chang-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYoon Dae Han-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHyunwook Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJoon Seok Lim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHan Sang Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJoong Bae Ahn-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.clcc.2023.05.003-
dc.contributor.localIdA01098-
dc.contributor.localIdA01126-
dc.contributor.localIdA02105-
dc.contributor.localIdA02262-
dc.contributor.localIdA03408-
dc.contributor.localIdA04658-
dc.contributor.localIdA04273-
dc.contributor.localIdA04313-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ03468-
dc.identifier.eissn1938-0674-
dc.identifier.pmid37271592-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1533002823000488-
dc.subject.keywordPostoperative surveillance-
dc.subject.keywordPrognosis-
dc.subject.keywordRecurrence-
dc.subject.keywordRisk factor-
dc.subject.keywordSurveillance-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Han Sang-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor김한상-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor김현욱-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor신상준-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor안중배-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor임준석-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor장지석-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor한대훈-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor한윤대-
dc.citation.volume22-
dc.citation.number3-
dc.citation.startPage307-
dc.citation.endPage317-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationCLINICAL COLORECTAL CANCER, Vol.22(3) : 307-317, 2023-09-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Radiation Oncology (방사선종양학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Radiology (영상의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Surgery (외과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.