0 151

Cited 0 times in

Safety and efficacy of letibotulinumtoxinA(BOTULAX®) in treatment of post stroke upper limb spasticity: a randomized, double blind, multi-center, phase III clinical trial

Authors
 Kyung Hee Do  ;  Min Ho Chun  ;  Nam-Jong Paik  ;  Yoon Ghil Park  ;  Shi-Uk Lee  ;  Min-Wook Kim  ;  Don-Kyu Kim 
Citation
 CLINICAL REHABILITATION, Vol.31(9) : 1179-1188, 2017-09 
Journal Title
CLINICAL REHABILITATION
ISSN
 0269-2155 
Issue Date
2017-09
MeSH
Adult ; Botulinum Toxins, Type A / therapeutic use* ; Double-Blind Method ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Muscle Spasticity / drug therapy* ; Muscle Spasticity / etiology ; Neuromuscular Agents / therapeutic use* ; Prospective Studies ; Republic of Korea ; Stroke / complications* ; Treatment Outcome ; Upper Extremity
Keywords
Spasticity ; botulinum neurotoxin type A ; efficacy ; safety ; stroke
Abstract
Objective: To investigate a new botulinum neurotoxin type A, termed letibotulinumtoxinA(Botulax®) and compare its efficacy and safety for post-stroke upper limb spasticity with that of onabotulinumtoxinA(Botox®).

Design: A prospective, double-blinded, multicenter, randomized controlled clinical study.

Setting: Six university hospitals in Korea.

Subjects: A total of 187 stroke participants with upper limb spasticity.

Interventions: Two kinds of botulinum neurotoxin type A were used. One set of injection was performed and total injected doses were 309.21±62.48U(Botulax) and 312.64±49.99U(Botox)( P>0.05).

Main measures: Primary outcome was measured using the modified Ashworth scale for wrist flexors at week 4 and secondary outcome was measured using modified Ashworth scale for wrist flexors, elbow flexors, finger flexors, and thumb flexors as well as Global Assessment in spasticity, Disability Assessment Scale, and Caregiver Burden Scale. Safety measures including adverse events, vital signs and physical examination, and laboratory tests were also monitored.

Results: The mean ages for the Botulax group were 56.81±9.49 and which for the Botox group were 56.93±11.93( P>0.05). In primary outcome, the change in modified Ashworth scale for wrist flexors was -1.45±0.61 in the Botulax group and -1.40±0.57 in the Botox group, and the difference between the two groups was -0.06(95% CI:-0.23-0.12, P>0.05). In secondary outcome, both groups demonstrated significant improvements with respect to modified Ashworth scale, Global Assessment in spasticity, Disability Assessment Scale, and Caregiver Burden Scale ( P<0.05), and no significant difference was observed between the two groups ( P>0.05). In addition, safety measures showed no significant differences between the two groups ( P>0.05).

Conclusions: The efficacy and safety of Botulax were comparable with those of Botox in treatment of post-stoke upper limb spasticity.
Full Text
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0269215516689331
DOI
10.1177/0269215516689331
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Rehabilitation Medicine (재활의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Park, Yoon Ghil(박윤길) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9054-5300
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/195665
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links