0 614

Cited 0 times in

Cited 38 times in

Percentages of hepatocellular carcinoma in LI-RADS categories with CT and MRI: A systematic review and meta-Analysis

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorLee, Sun young-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Yeun Yoon-
dc.contributor.authorShin, Jaeseung-
dc.contributor.authorSon, Won Jeong-
dc.contributor.authorRoh, Yun Ho-
dc.contributor.authorChoi, Jin Young-
dc.contributor.authorSirlin, Claude B.-
dc.contributor.authorChernyak, Victoria-
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-31T05:35:59Z-
dc.date.available2023-05-31T05:35:59Z-
dc.date.created2023-06-12-
dc.date.issued2023-04-
dc.identifier.issn0033-8419-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/194218-
dc.description.abstractBackground: The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) CT and MRI algorithm applies equally to CT, MRI with extracellular contrast agents (ECA-MRI), and MRI with gadoxetate (Gx-MRI). Purpose: To estimate pooled percentages of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and overall malignancy for each LI-RADS category with CT and MRI. Materials and Methods: MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched for research articles (January 2014 April 2021) reporting the percentages of observations in each LI-RADS category with use of versions 2014, 2017, or 2018. Study design, population characteristics, imaging modality, reference standard, and numbers of HCC and non-HCC malignancies in each category were recorded. A random-effects model evaluated the pooled percentage of HCC and overall malignancy for each category. Results: There were 49 studies with 9620 patients and a total 11 562 observations, comprising 7921 HCCs, 1132 non-HCC malignancies, and 2509 benign entities. No HCC or non-HCC malignancies were reported with any modality in the LR-1 category. The pooled percentages of HCC for CT, ECA-MRI, and Gx-MRI, respectively, were 10%, 6%, and 1% for LR-2 (P = .16); 48%, 31%, and 38% for LR-3 (P = .42); 76%, 64%, and 77% for LR-4 (P = .62); 96%, 95%, and 96% for LR-5 (P = .76); 88%, 76%, and 78% for LR-5V or LR-TIV (tumor in vein) (P = .42); and 20%, 30%, and 35% for LR-M (P = .32). Most LR-M (93% 100%) and LR-5V or LR-TIV (99% 100%) observations were malignant, regardless of modality. Conclusion: There was no difference in percentages of hepatocellular carcinoma and overall malignancy between CT, MRI with extracellular contrast agents, and MRI with gadoxetate for any Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System categories. © 2023 Radiological Society of North America Inc.. All rights reserved.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityrestriction-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherRadiological Society of North America-
dc.relation.isPartOfRadiology-
dc.relation.isPartOfRADIOLOGY-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.titlePercentages of hepatocellular carcinoma in LI-RADS categories with CT and MRI: A systematic review and meta-Analysis-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Radiology (영상의학교실)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLee, Sun young-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, Yeun Yoon-
dc.contributor.googleauthorShin, Jaeseung-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSon, Won Jeong-
dc.contributor.googleauthorRoh, Yun Ho-
dc.contributor.googleauthorChoi, Jin Young-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSirlin, Claude B.-
dc.contributor.googleauthorChernyak, Victoria-
dc.identifier.doi10.1148/radiol.220646-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ02596-
dc.identifier.eissn1527-1315-
dc.identifier.pmid36625748-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Yeun-Yoon-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorLee, Sun young-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Yeun Yoon-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorShin, Jaeseung-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorSon, Won Jeong-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorRoh, Yun Ho-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorChoi, Jin Young-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85151044667-
dc.identifier.wosid000986795600002-
dc.citation.volume307-
dc.citation.number1-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationRadiology, Vol.307(1), 2023-04-
dc.identifier.rimsid79439-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.subject.keywordPlusGADOXETIC-ACID-
dc.subject.keywordPlusMAGNETIC-RESONANCE-
dc.subject.keywordPlusDIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE-
dc.subject.keywordPlusHEPATIC OBSERVATIONS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusCOMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY-
dc.subject.keywordPlusVERSION 2018-
dc.subject.keywordPlusDISCORDANCE-
dc.subject.keywordPlusACCURACY-
dc.subject.keywordPlusCRITERIA-
dc.subject.keywordPlusIMPROVE-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.description.isOpenAccessN-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscie-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryRadiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaRadiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging-
dc.identifier.articlenoe220646-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Radiology (영상의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Biomedical Systems Informatics (의생명시스템정보학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.