121 296

Cited 0 times in

Hemodynamic responses to 1 MAC desflurane inhalation during anesthesia induction with propofol bolus and remifentanil continuous infusion: a prospective randomized single-blind clinical investigation

Authors
 Jong Wha Lee  ;  Mi Kyeong Kim  ;  Ji Young Kim 
Citation
 BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, Vol.23(1) : 59, 2023-02 
Journal Title
BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY
Issue Date
2023-02
MeSH
Adult ; Anesthesia, General ; Anesthetics, Inhalation* / pharmacology ; Anesthetics, Intravenous / pharmacology ; Desflurane / pharmacology ; Heart Rate ; Hemodynamics ; Humans ; Isoflurane* / pharmacology ; Piperidines / adverse effects ; Propofol* / pharmacology ; Prospective Studies ; Remifentanil / pharmacology ; Sevoflurane / pharmacology ; Single-Blind Method ; Young Adult
Keywords
Age ; Desflurane ; Hemodynamic response ; Remifentanil ; Sevoflurane
Abstract
Background: Desflurane is not recommended during anesthesia induction because of its sympathetic stimulation effect, particularly in patients with myocardial ischemic disease. To date, the hemodynamic response to 1 MAC desflurane inhalation in combination with remifentanil infusion during anesthesia induction has rarely been reported.

Methods: This investigation was designed to compare hemodynamic responses to 1 MAC desflurane (group D, n = 200) with sevoflurane (group S, n = 200) during anesthesia induction and endotracheal intubation in adult patients undergoing elective spine surgery. Subgroup analysis of the different age subgroups was also performed. With continuous infusion of remifentanil 0.1 μg/kg/min, anesthesia was induced with propofol bolus, and endotracheal intubation was performed after muscle relaxation. Heart rate (HR) and mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) were measured every minute for 5 min after anesthesia induction (T1-5) and after endotracheal intubation (T6-10).

Results: HR was significantly higher in group D (n = 182) than in group S (n = 173) at T3-10 except at T6 (1 min after intubation) (all P < 0.05). In the age-based subgroup analyses, which subdivided the group D and S into four subgroups based on patient's age, the changes in HR from baseline values were significantly different between the coeval subgroups of patients in their 20-29 years and 30-39 years of age (all P < 0.05). MAP was reduced from baseline value, irrespective of group and age.

Conclusion: Inhalation of 1 MAC desflurane during anesthesia induction with propofol bolus and remifentanil continuous infusion and during endotracheal intubation was more likely to induce elevations in HR more likely than 1 MAC sevoflurane, especially in younger patients.

Trial registration: This study was registered in the Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS, http://cris.nih.go.kr ) of the Republic of Korea on Feb 12, 2016 (Registration No. KCT 0,001,813).
Files in This Item:
T202301498.pdf Download
DOI
10.1186/s12871-023-02002-6
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (마취통증의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Kim, Ji Young(김지영) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5822-0338
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/193666
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links