0 225

Cited 5 times in

Diagnostic performance of endoscopic ultrasound elastography for differential diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions: A propensity score-matched analysis

Authors
 In Rae Cho  ;  Seok-Hoo Jeong  ;  Huapyong Kang  ;  Eui Joo Kim  ;  Yeon Suk Kim  ;  Soyoung Jeon  ;  Jae Hee Cho 
Citation
 PANCREATOLOGY, Vol.23(1) : 105-111, 2023-01 
Journal Title
PANCREATOLOGY
ISSN
 1424-3903 
Issue Date
2023-01
MeSH
Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal* / diagnostic imaging ; Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal* / pathology ; Diagnosis, Differential ; Elasticity Imaging Techniques* / methods ; Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration ; Endosonography / methods ; Humans ; Neuroendocrine Tumors* / pathology ; Pancreatic Neoplasms* / pathology ; Pancreatitis* / pathology ; Propensity Score ; Retrospective Studies
Keywords
Diagnosis ; Differential diagnosis ; Endoscopic ultrasonography ; Pancreatic neoplasm ; Propensity score
Abstract
Background: Endoscopic ultrasound-elastography (EUS-EG) is a non-invasive complementary diagnostic method for differential diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions (SPL). However, the optimal strain ratio (SR) value and diagnostic performance of EUS-EG have not yet been determined in pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm (PNEN), mass-forming pancreatitis (MFP), and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). We aimed to determine the optimal SR value in EUS-EG for differential diagnosis of SPLs.

Methods: Patients who underwent EUS-EG for SPL evaluation between July 2016 and June 2019 were retrospectively investigated. Patients were divided into three groups based on the final diagnosis (PNEN, MFP, or PDAC). Patient demographics, characteristics of SPL, and EUS-EG were compared.

Results: The mean (± standard deviation) SR value for each group were 11.85 ± 7.56 (PNEN, n = 10), 11.45 ± 5.97 (MFP, n = 37), and 22.50 ± 13.19 (PDAC, n = 87). Multinomial logistic regression analysis revealed that an increase of SR value was significantly associated with PDAC (PNEN versus PDAC, p = 0.0216; MFP versus PDAC, p = 0.0006). The optimal cut-off value for differential diagnosis was confirmed as 17.14 after propensity score matching.

Conclusions: We provided the optimal cut-off SR values for differential diagnosis between MFP and PDAC. EUS-EG can be used as a supplementary diagnostic method in the diagnosis of SPLs. (Clinical trial registration number: https://cris.nih.go.kr/cris: KCT0002082).
Full Text
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1424390322008249?via%3Dihub
DOI
10.1016/j.pan.2022.12.002
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Cho, Jae Hee(조재희) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4174-0091
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/193650
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links