Adult ; Angiogenesis Inhibitors / therapeutic use ; Bevacizumab / therapeutic use ; Choroidal Neovascularization* / complications ; Choroidal Neovascularization* / diagnosis ; Choroidal Neovascularization* / drug therapy ; Endothelial Growth Factors / therapeutic use ; Female ; Fluorescein Angiography ; Humans ; Intravitreal Injections ; Male ; Osteoma* / complications ; Osteoma* / diagnosis ; Osteoma* / drug therapy ; Ranibizumab / therapeutic use ; Retrospective Studies ; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A
Abstract
Purpose: To determine potential factors associated with the long-term visual prognoses in patients with choroidal osteoma undergoing anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment.
Design: Retrospective case series.
Methods: Patients diagnosed at tertiary high-volume hospitals between January 2000 and December 2020 were evaluated. The primary outcome measure was visual acuity at 5-year follow-up. The secondary outcome measures included factors associated with favorable vision, defined as loss of <1 line and >20/200 vision.
Results: Of 38 eyes from 36 patients (22 female, 61%; mean age 38 years) with choroidal osteoma, 23 eyes (61%) received anti-VEGF treatment (bevacizumab 1.25mg/0.05 cc, monthly or treat-and-extend) and 65% completed the 5 years of follow-up. All treated eyes had associated chorioretinal comorbidities (subretinal fluid 91%; choroidal neovascularization 74%; subretinal hemorrhage 30%). Although there was significant vision loss by 5 years (P = .002), 12 eyes (44%) had favorable outcomes. Only tumor thickness was significantly associated with unfavorable visual outcomes (OR 917.1, 95% CI 1.0-5687.7; P = .049). The optimal cut-off point predictive of visual outcomes was 1.4 mm, and tumor thickness ≥ 1.4 mm was associated with unfavorable vision (OR 27.0, 95% CI 2.0-368.4; P = .013).
Conclusions: Among patients with choroidal osteoma undergoing anti-VEGF therapy, a particular patient subset presented with divergent outcomes with very poor vision. Tumor thickness appeared to be the differentiating factor and is thus a potential prognostic indicator for long-term visual prognoses.