Cited 1 times in

Applicability of endoscopic submucosal dissection for patients with early gastric cancer beyond the expanded indication for endoscopic submucosal dissection

Authors
 Jeong Ho Song  ;  Sejin Lee  ;  Sung Hyun Park  ;  Anastasios Kottikias  ;  Aleisa Abdulmohsen  ;  Nasser Alrashidi  ;  Minah Cho  ;  Yoo Min Kim  ;  Hyoung-Il Kim  ;  Woo Jin Hyung 
Citation
 SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, Vol.36(11) : 8349-8357, 2022-11 
Journal Title
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES
ISSN
 0930-2794 
Issue Date
2022-11
MeSH
Early Detection of Cancer ; Endoscopic Mucosal Resection* / adverse effects ; Gastrectomy / adverse effects ; Gastric Mucosa / pathology ; Gastric Mucosa / surgery ; Humans ; Retrospective Studies ; Stomach Neoplasms* / pathology ; Stomach Neoplasms* / surgery ; Treatment Outcome
Keywords
Early gastric cancer ; Endoscopic submucosal dissection ; Gastric cancer
Abstract
Background: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) application for patients with tumors beyond the expanded indication for ESD is inconclusive. This study aimed to identify the preoperative clinical features that can be curatively treated with ESD in patients with early gastric cancer (EGC) beyond the indication of ESD.

Methods: From 2006 to 2016, 673 patients who underwent gastrectomy for EGC beyond the expanded indication for ESD based on preoperative assessments were retrospectively reviewed. We identified tumors curatively resected by ESD based on the postoperative pathologic findings. We also analyzed the clinical and pre-treatment features to determine the risk factors associated with curative resection of ESD.

Results: 39% of the patients (263/673) who had undergone gastrectomy had tumors of endoscopic curability A or B (eCuraA/B) that could be treated by ESD alone. In multivariate analysis, tumor size ≤ 10 mm (OR 0.240; 95% CI = 0.12-0.46), no ulceration (OR 0.500; 95% CI = 0.29-0.87), differentiated histology (OR 0.599; 95% CI = 0.43-0.84), and location in the distal two-thirds of the stomach (OR 0.499; 95% CI = 0.28-0.88) in pre-treatment assessment were identified as independent predictors of eCuraA/B. Considering the risk factors, 63.6% (7/11)/61.3% (19/31) of patients with a differentiated/undifferentiated tumor size ≤ 10 mm located in distal two-third of the stomach without ulceration were deemed as eCuraA/B.

Conclusions: This study suggests that patients with EGC indicated for surgery can be treated by ESD by adding tumor locations in the indication for ESD. Thus, ESD can be applied for patients with a tumor size ≤ 10 mm located in the lower/middle stomach without ulceration.
Full Text
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00464-022-09288-6
DOI
10.1007/s00464-022-09288-6
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Surgery (외과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Kim, Yoo Min(김유민)
Kim, Hyoung Il(김형일) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6134-4523
Park, Sung Hyun(박성현)
Song, Jeong Ho(송정호)
Lee, Sejin(이세진)
Cho, Minah(조민아) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3011-5813
Hyung, Woo Jin(형우진) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8593-9214
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/192286
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links