0 219

Cited 6 times in

Multicenter prospective validation study for international chronic ocular graft-versus-host disease consensus diagnostic criteria

Authors
 Yoko Ogawa  ;  Reza Dana  ;  Stella Kim  ;  Sandeep Jain  ;  Mark I Rosenblatt  ;  Victor L Perez  ;  Janine A Clayton  ;  Monica Alves  ;  Eduardo Melani Rocha  ;  Francisco Amparo  ;  Kyoung Yul Seo  ;  Yan Wang  ;  Joanne Shen  ;  Joo Youn Oh  ;  Murugesan Vanathi  ;  Sridevi Nair  ;  Kyung-Sun Na  ;  Anjo Riemens  ;  Kimberly Sippel  ;  Matias Soifer  ;  Shudan Wang  ;  Marilia Trindade  ;  Mee Kum Kim  ;  Chang Ho Yoon  ;  Ryuichiro Yagi  ;  Ryo Hiratsuka  ;  Mamoru Ogawa  ;  Eisuke Shimizu  ;  Yasunori Sato  ;  Stephen Pflugfelder  ;  Kazuo Tsubota 
Citation
 OCULAR SURFACE, Vol.26 : 200-208, 2022-10 
Journal Title
OCULAR SURFACE
ISSN
 1542-0124 
Issue Date
2022-10
Keywords
Chronic ocular graft-versus-host disease ; Dry eye disease ; International chronic ocular GVHD consensus Criteria ; NIH diagnostic Criteria 2014
Abstract
Purpose: To validate the international chronic ocular graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) diagnostic criteria (ICCGVHD) compared to the National Institute of Health diagnostic criteria 2014 (NIH2014) for chronic ocular GVHD.

Methods: Between 2013 and 2019, the study enrolled 233 patients with or without chronic ocular GVHD combined with the presence or absence of systemic chronic GVHD in an internationally prospective multicenter and observational cohort from 9 institutions. All patients were evaluated for four clinical parameters of ICCGVHD.

Results: The relation between the ICCGVHD score (0-11) and NIH2014 eye score (0-4) was relatively high (r = 0.708, 95% CI: 0.637-0.767, p < 0.001). The sensitivity and specificity of ICCGVHD for NIH 2014 for 233 patients were 94.3% (95% CI: 89.6%-98.1%) and 71.7% (95% CI: 63.0-79.5%), respectively (cutoff value of the ICCGVHD score = 6). The positive predictive value was 77.1% (95% CI: 71.1%-82.1%), and the negative predictive value was 87.0% (95% CI:81.6-92.5%). For the patients with systemic GVHD (n = 171), the sensitivity and specificity were 94.2% and 67.2%, respectively (ICCGVHD-score cutoff value = 6). By receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.903 (95% CI: 0.859-0.948). For patients without systemic GVHD (n = 62), the sensitivity and specificity were 100% and 76.7%, respectively (ICCGVHD-score cutoff value = 6). The AUC was 0.891 (95% CI 0.673-1.000).

Conclusions: Good sensitivity, specificity, predictive value and correlation were found between ICCGVHD and NIH2014. ICCGVHD scores ≥6 can be useful to diagnose ocular GVHD with or without systemic GVHD for clinical research.
Full Text
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1542012422000842?via%3Dihub
DOI
10.1016/j.jtos.2022.09.002
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Ophthalmology (안과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Seo, Kyoung Yul(서경률) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9855-1980
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/192250
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links