287 230

Cited 18 times in

Triple Therapy-Based on Tegoprazan, a New Potassium-Competitive Acid Blocker, for First-Line Treatment of Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III, Clinical Trial

Authors
 Yoon Jin Choi  ;  Yong Chan Lee  ;  Jung Mogg Kim  ;  Jin Il Kim  ;  Jeong Seop Moon  ;  Yun Jeong Lim  ;  Gwang Ho Baik  ;  Byoung Kwan Son  ;  Hang Lak Lee  ;  Kyoung Oh Kim  ;  Nayoung Kim  ;  Kwang Hyun Ko  ;  Hye-Kyung Jung  ;  Ki-Nam Shim  ;  Hoon Jai Chun  ;  Byung-Wook Kim  ;  Hyuk Lee  ;  Jie-Hyun Kim  ;  Hyunsoo Chung  ;  Sang Gyun Kim  ;  Jae Young Jang 
Citation
 GUT AND LIVER, Vol.16(4) : 535-546, 2022-07 
Journal Title
GUT AND LIVER
ISSN
 1976-2283 
Issue Date
2022-07
MeSH
Amoxicillin ; Anti-Bacterial Agents / therapeutic use ; Benzene Derivatives ; Clarithromycin ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Helicobacter Infections* / drug therapy ; Helicobacter pylori* ; Humans ; Imidazoles ; Potassium / pharmacology ; Potassium / therapeutic use ; Proton Pump Inhibitors ; Treatment Outcome
Keywords
Helicobacter pylori ; Potassium-competitive acid blocker ; Tegoprazan
Abstract
Background/aims: We examined the efficacy and safety of tegoprazan as a part of first-line triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication.

Methods: A randomized, double-blind, controlled, multicenter study was performed to evaluate whether tegoprazan (50 mg)-based triple therapy (TPZ) was noninferior to lansoprazole (30 mg)- based triple therapy (LPZ) (with amoxicillin 1 g and clarithromycin 500 mg; all administered twice daily for 7 days) for treating H. pylori. The primary endpoint was the H. pylori eradication rate. Subgroup analyses were performed according to the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19 genotype, the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of amoxicillin and clarithromycin, and underlying gastric diseases.

Results: In total, 350 H. pylori-positive patients were randomly allocated to the TPZ or LPZ group. The H. pylori eradication rates in the TPZ and LPZ groups were 62.86% (110/175) and 60.57% (106/175) in an intention-to-treat analysis and 69.33% (104/150) and 67.33% (101/150) in a per-protocol analysis (non-inferiority test, p=0.009 and p=0.013), respectively. Subgroup analyses according to MICs or CYP2C19 did not show remarkable differences in eradication rate. Both first-line triple therapies were well-tolerated with no notable differences.

Conclusions: TPZ is as effective as proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapy and is as safe as first-line H. pylori eradication therapy but does not overcome the clarithromycin resistance of H. pylori in Korea (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03317223).
Files in This Item:
T202203279.pdf Download
DOI
10.5009/gnl220055
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Kim, Jie-Hyun(김지현) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9198-3326
Lee, Yong Chan(이용찬) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8800-6906
Choi, Yoon Jin(최윤진)
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/191670
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links