0 436

Cited 6 times in

Surgical Findings and Outcomes of Endotension Following Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author고영국-
dc.contributor.author김경민-
dc.contributor.author원종윤-
dc.contributor.author주현철-
dc.contributor.author한기창-
dc.contributor.author권준호-
dc.contributor.author김정환-
dc.contributor.author김만득-
dc.contributor.author문성모-
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-22T01:36:23Z-
dc.date.available2022-12-22T01:36:23Z-
dc.date.issued2022-03-
dc.identifier.issn0890-5096-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/191274-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Endotension is one of the detrimental complications after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and surgical management has been considered as standard of care. However, there is a paucity of data regarding the findings, and outcomes of such surgical intervention. The aim of this study was to investigate intraoperative findings and outcomes of surgical treatment for endotension after EVAR. Methods: Between January 2005 and October 2018, of the 708 patients who underwent EVAR for aneurysm aortic aneurysm; 12 patients (mean age of 76.1; range 66-88) who underwent open repair for endotension were retrospectively analyzed. The anatomical characteristics of the aorta and surgical findings were reviewed. The rates of early and late procedural complications, and overall mortality were evaluated. Results: The median interval between the EVAR and surgical conversion was 45.9 months (range 17.1-46.9). Three of the twelve patients underwent emergency surgery due to aneurysm rupture. The median aneurysm sac size, the proximal neck diameter, and the proximal neck length before EVAR were 64 mm, 23.5 mm, and 30.5 mm, respectively, that changed before open repair to 93.5 mm (P = 0.02), 25 mm (P = 0.011), and 23 mm (P = 0.003), respectively. In four of the twelve patients, radiographically undetected endoleak was identified during surgery to be Type Ia, Ib, II, and III, respectively. The rates of early and late procedural complications, and overall mortality were 8.3%, 8.3% and 8.3%, respectively. Conclusions: Patients with endotension have a risk of delayed endoleak and aneurysm rupture; secondary intervention should be performed in such cases to prevent fatal complications. Surgical treatment appears to be a curative treatment for endotension with favorable outcomes. In addition, the possibility of an undetected endoleak should be considered as a potential cause of endotension.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityrestriction-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.relation.isPartOfANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.subject.MESHAged-
dc.subject.MESHAged, 80 and over-
dc.subject.MESHAortic Aneurysm, Abdominal / surgery*-
dc.subject.MESHBlood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation / adverse effects-
dc.subject.MESHEndoleak / diagnosis-
dc.subject.MESHEndoleak / etiology*-
dc.subject.MESHEndovascular Procedures / adverse effects*-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHMale-
dc.subject.MESHPostoperative Complications / etiology*-
dc.subject.MESHRetrospective Studies-
dc.subject.MESHStents-
dc.titleSurgical Findings and Outcomes of Endotension Following Endovascular Aneurysm Repair-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSeung Chul Han-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJoon Ho Kwon-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHyun-Chel Joo-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKichang Han-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJung-Hwan Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSungmo Moon-
dc.contributor.googleauthorGyoung Min Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMan-Deuk Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJong Yun Won-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYoung-Guk Ko-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.avsg.2021.08.052-
dc.contributor.localIdA00127-
dc.contributor.localIdA00296-
dc.contributor.localIdA02443-
dc.contributor.localIdA03960-
dc.contributor.localIdA05062-
dc.contributor.localIdA05085-
dc.contributor.localIdA00905-
dc.contributor.localIdA00420-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ00185-
dc.identifier.eissn1615-5947-
dc.identifier.pmid34748946-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890509621007858?via%3Dihub-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKo, Young Guk-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor고영국-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor김경민-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor원종윤-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor주현철-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor한기창-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor권준호-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor김정환-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor김만득-
dc.citation.volume80-
dc.citation.startPage264-
dc.citation.endPage272-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, Vol.80 : 264-272, 2022-03-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Radiology (영상의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (흉부외과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.