193 356

Cited 0 times in

Cited 12 times in

Efficacy and Safety of CT-P10 Versus Rituximab in Untreated Low-Tumor-Burden Follicular Lymphoma: Final Results of a Randomized Phase III Study

Authors
 Kwak, Larry W.  ;  Sancho, Juan-Manuel  ;  Cho, Seok-Goo  ;  Nakazawa, Hideyuki  ;  Suzumiya, Junji  ;  Tumyan, Gayane  ;  Kim, Jin Seok  ;  Menne, Tobias  ;  Mariz, Jose  ;  Ilyin, Nikolai  ;  Jurczak, Wojciech  ;  Lopez Martinez, Aurelio  ;  Samoilova, Olga  ;  Zhavrid, Edvard  ;  Yanez Ruiz, Eduardo  ;  Trneny, Marek  ;  Popplewell, Leslie  ;  Ogura, Michinori  ;  Kim, Won-Seog  ;  Lee, Sang Joon  ;  Kim, Sung Hyun  ;  Ahn, Keum Young  ;  Buske, Christian 
Citation
 Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma & Leukemia, Vol.22(2) : 89-97, 2022-02 
Journal Title
CLINICAL LYMPHOMA MYELOMA & LEUKEMIA
ISSN
 2152-2650 
Issue Date
2022-02
Keywords
Biosimilar ; Single switch ; Time-to-event data ; Therapeutic similarity
Abstract
We assessed the efficacy and safety of rituximab and its biosimilar, CT-P10, in treatment-naive low-tumor-burden follicular lymphoma patients, with a median follow-up of 29.2 months. Data from the trial show that the efficacy and safety of rituximab and CT-P10 were similar, including after a single switch from rituximab to CT-P10. These data support the therapeutic similarity of rituximab and CT-P10. Introduction: This double-blind, parallel-group, active-controlled phase III trial (NCT02260804) assessed CT-P10 and rituximab safety and efficacy in patients with previously untreated low-tumor-burden follicular lymphoma (LTBFL), including after a single switch from rituximab to CT-P10. Patients and Methods: LTBFL patients were randomized (1:1) to receive CT-P10 or rituximab (375 mg/m(2) intravenously; day 1 of 4 7-day cycles). Patients achieving disease control entered a 2-year maintenance period. CT-P10 or rituximab were administered every 8 weeks (6 cycles) in year 1; all patients could receive CT-P10 (every 8 weeks; 6 cycles) in year 2. Secondary endpoints (reported here) were overall response rate (ORR) dur ing the study period, progression-free survival (PFS), time to progression (TTP), and overall survival (OS). Safety and immunogenicity were evaluated. Results: Between November 9, 2015 and January 4, 2018, 258 patients were randomized (130 for CT-P10; 128 for rituximab). ORR was similar between groups over the study period (CT-P10: 88%; rituximab: 87%). After 29.2 months' median follow-up, median PFS, TTP, and OS were not estimable; 24-month Kaplan-Meier estimates suggested similarity between groups. Overall, 114 (CT-P10: 88%), and 104 (rituximab: 81%) patients experienced treatment-emergent adverse events. The single switch was well tolerated. Conclusion: These updated data support therapeutic similarity of CT-P10 and rituximab and support the use of CT-P10 monotherapy for previously untreated LTBFL.
DOI
10.1016/j.clml.2021.08.005
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Kim, Jin Seok(김진석) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8986-8436
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/191228
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links