0 490

Cited 0 times in

Cited 49 times in

Safety and Antitumor Activity of alpha-PD-L1 Antibody as Monotherapy or in Combination with alpha-TIM-3 Antibody in Patients with Microsatellite Instability-High/Mismatch Repair-Deficient Tumors

Authors
 Hollebecque, Antoine  ;  Chung, Hyun Cheol  ;  de Miguel, Maria J.  ;  Italiano, Antoine  ;  Machiels, Jean-Pascal  ;  Lin, Chia-Chi  ;  Dhani, Neesha C.  ;  Peeters, Marc  ;  Moreno, Victor  ;  Su, Wu-Chou  ;  Chow, Kay Hoong  ;  Galvao, Violeta R.  ;  Carlsen, Michelle  ;  Yu, Danni  ;  Szpurka, Anna M.  ;  Zhao, Yumin  ;  Schmidt, Shelly L.  ;  Gandhi, Leena  ;  Xu, Xiaojian  ;  Bang, Yung-Jue 
Citation
 Clinical Cancer Research, Vol.27(23) : 6393-6404, 2021-12 
Journal Title
CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
ISSN
 1078-0432 
Issue Date
2021-12
Abstract
Purpose: Immune checkpoint inhibitors show high response rates and durable clinical benefit in microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair-deficient (MSI-H/dMMR) tumors. However, 50%-60% do not respond to single-agent anti-programmed death-1/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) antibodies, and approximately 50% of respon-ders relapse within 6-12 months. This phase Ib trial evaluated safety and antitumor activity of anti-PD-L1 antibody LY3300054 mono-therapy or in combination with anti-TIM-3 antibody LY3321367 in patients with MSI-H/dMMR advanced solid tumors. Patients and Methods: Eligible patients >= 18 years without prior anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy received LY3300054 monotherapy (N = 40) or combination (N = 20); patients with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-resistant/refractory tumors received the combination (N = 22). LY3300054 (700 mg) and anti-TIM-3 antibody (cycles 1-2: 1,200 mg, cycle 3 onward: 600 mg) were administered intrave-nously every 2 weeks. Primary endpoints were safety and tolerability. Results: Eighty-two patients were enrolled. Most had colorectal (n = 39, 47.6%) or endometrial (n = 14, 17.1%) tumors. More than 70% of patients in the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-resistant/refractory combination cohort had received >= 3 treatment lines. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) occurred in 22 patients (55.0%) receiving monotherapy, 13 (65.0%) in the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-naive combination cohort, and 6 (27.3%) in the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-resistant/refractory combination cohort. A total of 2 patients (5.0%) receiving monotherapy and 3 (7.1%) receiving the combination experienced grade >_3 TRAEs. Objective responses occurred in 13 patients (32.5%) with monotherapy, 9 (45.0%) in the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-naive combination cohort, and 1 patient (4.5%) in the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-resistant/refractory combination cohort. Conclusions: LY3300054 monotherapy and combined LY3300054/anti-TIM-3 had manageable safety profiles. Both regimens showed promising clinical activity against PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-naive MSI-H/dMMR tumors. The combination had limited clinical benefit in patients with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-resistant/ refractory MSI-H/dMMR tumors.
DOI
10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-0261
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Chung, Hyun Cheol(정현철) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0920-9471
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/190635
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links