0 276

Cited 37 times in

Safety and Antitumor Activity of α-PD-L1 Antibody as Monotherapy or in Combination with α-TIM-3 Antibody in Patients with Microsatellite Instability-High/Mismatch Repair-Deficient Tumors

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author정현철-
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-14T01:49:54Z-
dc.date.available2022-09-14T01:49:54Z-
dc.date.issued2021-12-
dc.identifier.issn1078-0432-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/190635-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Immune checkpoint inhibitors show high response rates and durable clinical benefit in microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair-deficient (MSI-H/dMMR) tumors. However, 50%-60% do not respond to single-agent anti-programmed death-1/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) antibodies, and approximately 50% of responders relapse within 6-12 months. This phase Ib trial evaluated safety and antitumor activity of anti-PD-L1 antibody LY3300054 monotherapy or in combination with anti-TIM-3 antibody LY3321367 in patients with MSI-H/dMMR advanced solid tumors. Patients and methods: Eligible patients ≥18 years without prior anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy received LY3300054 monotherapy (N = 40) or combination (N = 20); patients with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-resistant/refractory tumors received the combination (N = 22). LY3300054 (700 mg) and anti-TIM-3 antibody (cycles 1-2: 1,200 mg, cycle 3 onward: 600 mg) were administered intravenously every 2 weeks. Primary endpoints were safety and tolerability. Results: Eighty-two patients were enrolled. Most had colorectal (n = 39, 47.6%) or endometrial (n = 14, 17.1%) tumors. More than 70% of patients in the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-resistant/refractory combination cohort had received ≥3 treatment lines. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) occurred in 22 patients (55.0%) receiving monotherapy, 13 (65.0%) in the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-naïve combination cohort, and 6 (27.3%) in the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-resistant/refractory combination cohort. A total of 2 patients (5.0%) receiving monotherapy and 3 (7.1%) receiving the combination experienced grade ≥3 TRAEs. Objective responses occurred in 13 patients (32.5%) with monotherapy, 9 (45.0%) in the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-naïve combination cohort, and 1 patient (4.5%) in the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-resistant/refractory combination cohort. Conclusions: LY3300054 monotherapy and combined LY3300054/anti-TIM-3 had manageable safety profiles. Both regimens showed promising clinical activity against PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-naïve MSI-H/dMMR tumors. The combination had limited clinical benefit in patients with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-resistant/refractory MSI-H/dMMR tumors. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02791334.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityrestriction-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherAmerican Association for Cancer Research-
dc.relation.isPartOfCLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.subject.MESHAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / adverse effects-
dc.subject.MESHB7-H1 Antigen* / adverse effects-
dc.subject.MESHDNA Mismatch Repair-
dc.subject.MESHHepatitis A Virus Cellular Receptor 2 / therapeutic use-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHMicrosatellite Instability-
dc.subject.MESHNeoplasms* / drug therapy-
dc.subject.MESHNeoplasms* / genetics-
dc.titleSafety and Antitumor Activity of α-PD-L1 Antibody as Monotherapy or in Combination with α-TIM-3 Antibody in Patients with Microsatellite Instability-High/Mismatch Repair-Deficient Tumors-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorAntoine Hollebecque-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHyun C Chung-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMaria J de Miguel-
dc.contributor.googleauthorAntoine Italiano-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJean-Pascal Machiels-
dc.contributor.googleauthorChia-Chi Lin-
dc.contributor.googleauthorNeesha C Dhani-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMarc Peeters-
dc.contributor.googleauthorVictor Moreno-
dc.contributor.googleauthorWu-Chou Su-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKay Hoong Chow-
dc.contributor.googleauthorVioleta R Galvao-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMichelle Carlsen-
dc.contributor.googleauthorDanni Yu-
dc.contributor.googleauthorAnna M Szpurka-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYumin Zhao-
dc.contributor.googleauthorShelly L Schmidt-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLeena Gandhi-
dc.contributor.googleauthorXiaojian Xu-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYung-Jue Bang-
dc.identifier.doi10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-0261-
dc.contributor.localIdA03773-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ00564-
dc.identifier.pmid34465599-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://aacrjournals.org/clincancerres/article/27/23/6393/675031/Safety-and-Antitumor-Activity-of-PD-L1-Antibody-as-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameChung, Hyun Cheol-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor정현철-
dc.citation.volume27-
dc.citation.number23-
dc.citation.startPage6393-
dc.citation.endPage6404-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationCLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, Vol.27(23) : 6393-6404, 2021-12-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.