84 157

Cited 144 times in

Nivolumab and Ipilimumab as Maintenance Therapy in Extensive-Disease Small-Cell Lung Cancer: CheckMate 451

Authors
 Taofeek K Owonikoko  ;  Keunchil Park  ;  Ramaswamy Govindan  ;  Neal Ready  ;  Martin Reck  ;  Solange Peters  ;  Shaker R Dakhil  ;  Alejandro Navarro  ;  Jerónimo Rodríguez-Cid  ;  Michael Schenker  ;  Jong-Seok Lee  ;  Vanesa Gutierrez  ;  Ivor Percent  ;  Daniel Morgensztern  ;  Carlos H Barrios  ;  Laurent Greillier  ;  Sofia Baka  ;  Miten Patel  ;  Wen Hong Lin  ;  Giovanni Selvaggi  ;  Christine Baudelet  ;  Jonathan Baden  ;  Dimple Pandya  ;  Parul Doshi  ;  Hye Ryun Kim 
Citation
 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, Vol.39(12) : 1349-1359, 2021-04 
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
ISSN
 0732-183X 
Issue Date
2021-04
MeSH
Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / therapeutic use* ; Double-Blind Method ; Female ; Humans ; Ipilimumab / administration & dosage* ; Ipilimumab / adverse effects ; Lung Neoplasms / drug therapy* ; Lung Neoplasms / mortality ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Nivolumab / administration & dosage* ; Nivolumab / adverse effects ; Small Cell Lung Carcinoma / drug therapy* ; Small Cell Lung Carcinoma / mortality
Abstract
Purpose: In extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC), response rates to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy are robust, but responses lack durability. CheckMate 451, a double-blind phase III trial, evaluated nivolumab plus ipilimumab and nivolumab monotherapy as maintenance therapy following first-line chemotherapy for ED-SCLC.

Methods: Patients with ED-SCLC, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1, and no progression after ≤ 4 cycles of first-line chemotherapy were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to nivolumab 1 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg once every 3 weeks for 12 weeks followed by nivolumab 240 mg once every 2 weeks, nivolumab 240 mg once every 2 weeks, or placebo for ≤ 2 years or until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary end point was overall survival (OS) with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus placebo. Secondary end points were hierarchically tested.

Results: Overall, 834 patients were randomly assigned. The minimum follow-up was 8.9 months. OS was not significantly prolonged with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus placebo (hazard ratio [HR], 0.92; 95% CI, 0.75 to 1.12; P = .37; median, 9.2 v 9.6 months). The HR for OS with nivolumab versus placebo was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.69 to 1.02); the median OS for nivolumab was 10.4 months. Progression-free survival HRs versus placebo were 0.72 for nivolumab plus ipilimumab (95% CI, 0.60 to 0.87) and 0.67 for nivolumab (95% CI, 0.56 to 0.81). A trend toward OS benefit with nivolumab plus ipilimumab was observed in patients with tumor mutational burden ≥ 13 mutations per megabase. Rates of grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were nivolumab plus ipilimumab (52.2%), nivolumab (11.5%), and placebo (8.4%).

Conclusion: Maintenance therapy with nivolumab plus ipilimumab did not prolong OS for patients with ED-SCLC who did not progress on first-line chemotherapy. There were no new safety signals.
Files in This Item:
T202126019.pdf Download
DOI
10.1200/JCO.20.02212
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Kim, Hye Ryun(김혜련) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1842-9070
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/190401
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links