91 163

Cited 144 times in

Nivolumab and Ipilimumab as Maintenance Therapy in Extensive-Disease Small-Cell Lung Cancer: CheckMate 451

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author김혜련-
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-14T01:19:39Z-
dc.date.available2022-09-14T01:19:39Z-
dc.date.issued2021-04-
dc.identifier.issn0732-183X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/190401-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: In extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC), response rates to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy are robust, but responses lack durability. CheckMate 451, a double-blind phase III trial, evaluated nivolumab plus ipilimumab and nivolumab monotherapy as maintenance therapy following first-line chemotherapy for ED-SCLC. Methods: Patients with ED-SCLC, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1, and no progression after ≤ 4 cycles of first-line chemotherapy were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to nivolumab 1 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg once every 3 weeks for 12 weeks followed by nivolumab 240 mg once every 2 weeks, nivolumab 240 mg once every 2 weeks, or placebo for ≤ 2 years or until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary end point was overall survival (OS) with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus placebo. Secondary end points were hierarchically tested. Results: Overall, 834 patients were randomly assigned. The minimum follow-up was 8.9 months. OS was not significantly prolonged with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus placebo (hazard ratio [HR], 0.92; 95% CI, 0.75 to 1.12; P = .37; median, 9.2 v 9.6 months). The HR for OS with nivolumab versus placebo was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.69 to 1.02); the median OS for nivolumab was 10.4 months. Progression-free survival HRs versus placebo were 0.72 for nivolumab plus ipilimumab (95% CI, 0.60 to 0.87) and 0.67 for nivolumab (95% CI, 0.56 to 0.81). A trend toward OS benefit with nivolumab plus ipilimumab was observed in patients with tumor mutational burden ≥ 13 mutations per megabase. Rates of grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were nivolumab plus ipilimumab (52.2%), nivolumab (11.5%), and placebo (8.4%). Conclusion: Maintenance therapy with nivolumab plus ipilimumab did not prolong OS for patients with ED-SCLC who did not progress on first-line chemotherapy. There were no new safety signals.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Clinical Oncology-
dc.relation.isPartOfJOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.subject.MESHAdult-
dc.subject.MESHAged-
dc.subject.MESHAged, 80 and over-
dc.subject.MESHAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / therapeutic use*-
dc.subject.MESHDouble-Blind Method-
dc.subject.MESHFemale-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHIpilimumab / administration & dosage*-
dc.subject.MESHIpilimumab / adverse effects-
dc.subject.MESHLung Neoplasms / drug therapy*-
dc.subject.MESHLung Neoplasms / mortality-
dc.subject.MESHMale-
dc.subject.MESHMiddle Aged-
dc.subject.MESHNivolumab / administration & dosage*-
dc.subject.MESHNivolumab / adverse effects-
dc.subject.MESHSmall Cell Lung Carcinoma / drug therapy*-
dc.subject.MESHSmall Cell Lung Carcinoma / mortality-
dc.titleNivolumab and Ipilimumab as Maintenance Therapy in Extensive-Disease Small-Cell Lung Cancer: CheckMate 451-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorTaofeek K Owonikoko-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKeunchil Park-
dc.contributor.googleauthorRamaswamy Govindan-
dc.contributor.googleauthorNeal Ready-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMartin Reck-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSolange Peters-
dc.contributor.googleauthorShaker R Dakhil-
dc.contributor.googleauthorAlejandro Navarro-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJerónimo Rodríguez-Cid-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMichael Schenker-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJong-Seok Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorVanesa Gutierrez-
dc.contributor.googleauthorIvor Percent-
dc.contributor.googleauthorDaniel Morgensztern-
dc.contributor.googleauthorCarlos H Barrios-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLaurent Greillier-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSofia Baka-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMiten Patel-
dc.contributor.googleauthorWen Hong Lin-
dc.contributor.googleauthorGiovanni Selvaggi-
dc.contributor.googleauthorChristine Baudelet-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJonathan Baden-
dc.contributor.googleauthorDimple Pandya-
dc.contributor.googleauthorParul Doshi-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHye Ryun Kim-
dc.identifier.doi10.1200/JCO.20.02212-
dc.contributor.localIdA01166-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ01331-
dc.identifier.eissn1527-7755-
dc.identifier.pmid33683919-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Hye Ryun-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor김혜련-
dc.citation.volume39-
dc.citation.number12-
dc.citation.startPage1349-
dc.citation.endPage1359-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationJOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, Vol.39(12) : 1349-1359, 2021-04-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.