74 339

Cited 31 times in

Serum procalcitonin as an independent diagnostic markers of bacteremia in febrile patients with hematologic malignancies

Authors
 Mina Yang  ;  Seung Jun Choi  ;  Jaewoong Lee  ;  Dong Gun Lee  ;  Yoon-Joo Kim  ;  Yeon-Joon Park  ;  Eun-Jee Oh 
Citation
 PLOS ONE, Vol.14(12) : e0225765, 2019-12 
Journal Title
PLOS ONE
Issue Date
2019-12
MeSH
Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Bacteremia / blood ; Bacteremia / complications* ; Bacteremia / diagnosis* ; Biomarkers / blood ; C-Reactive Protein / metabolism ; Female ; Fever / blood* ; Fever / complications* ; Hematologic Neoplasms / blood* ; Hematologic Neoplasms / complications* ; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neutropenia / blood ; Neutropenia / complications ; Procalcitonin / blood* ; ROC Curve ; Young Adult
Abstract
Background Serum procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP) are biomarkers of infection. In patients with hematologic disorders with or without hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), it is difficult to distinguish bloodstream infections from aseptic causes of febrile episodes. The objective of this study was to investigate diagnostic values of PCT and CRP in predicting systemic bacterial infection in patients with hematologic malignancies. Methods Clinical and laboratory data of 614 febrile episode cases from 511 patients were analyzed. Febrile episodes were classified into four groups: (1) culture-positive bacterial infection by Gram-positive cocci (GPC), (2) culture-positive bacterial infection by Gram-negative bacilli (GNB), (3) fungal infection, and (4) viral infection or a noninfectious etiology. Results Of 614 febrile cases, systemic bacterial infections were confirmed in 99 (16.1%) febrile episodes, including 38 (6.2%) GPC and 61 (9.9%) GNB infections. PCT levels were significantly higher in GNB infectious episodes than those in febrile episodes caused by fungal infection (0.58 ng/mL (95% CI: 0.26-1.61) vs. 0.22 ng/mL (0.16-0.38), P = 0.047). Bacterial infectious episodes showed higher PCT and CRP levels than non-bacterial events (PCT: 0.49 (0.26-0.93) ng/mL vs. 0.20 (0.18-0.22) ng/mL, P < 0.001; CRP: 76.6 (50.5-92.8) mg/L vs. 58.0 (51.1-66.5) mg/L, P = 0.036). For non-neutropenic febrile episodes, both PCT and CRP discriminated bacteremia from non-bacteremia. However, in neutropenic febrile episodes, PCT only distinguished bacteremia from non-bacteremia. In non-neutropenic episode, both PCT and CRP showed good diagnostic accuracy (AUC: 0.757 vs. 0.763). In febrile neutropenia, only PCT discriminated bacteremia from non-bacterial infection (AUC: 0.624) whereas CRP could not detect bacteremia (AUC: 0.500, 95% CI: 0.439-0.561, P > 0.05). Conclusions In this single-center observational study, PCT was more valuable than CRP for discriminating between bacteremia and non-bacteremia independent of neutropenia or HSCT.
Files in This Item:
T9992019219.pdf Download
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0225765
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Laboratory Medicine (진단검사의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Choi, Seung Jun(최승준) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0736-1055
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/189221
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links