0 561

Cited 0 times in

Chronological Trends of Breast Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Clinical, Radiologic, and Pathologic Perspectives

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author김가람-
dc.contributor.author김민정-
dc.contributor.author김은경-
dc.contributor.author김지예-
dc.contributor.author김하얀-
dc.contributor.author박영진-
dc.contributor.author윤정현-
dc.contributor.author이시은-
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-28T17:51:15Z-
dc.date.available2021-12-28T17:51:15Z-
dc.date.issued2021-12-
dc.identifier.issn1068-9265-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/187300-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Because no prior studies have evaluated the chronological trends of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) despite the increasing number of surgeries performed for DCIS, this study analyzed how the clinical, radiologic, and pathologic characteristics of DCIS changed during a 10-year period. Methods: Of 7123 patients who underwent primary breast cancer surgery at a single institution from 2006 to 2015, 792 patients with pure DCIS were included in this study. The chronological trends of age, symptoms, method for detecting either mammography or ultrasonography, tumor size, nuclear grade, comedonecrosis, and molecular markers were calculated using Poisson regression for all patients and asymptomatic patients. Results: During 10 years, DCIS surgery rates significantly increased (p < 0.001). Despite the high percentage of DCIS detected on mammography, the detection rate for DCIS by mammography significantly decreased (97.3% in 2006 to 67.6% in 2015; p = 0.025), whereas the detection rate by ultrasound significantly increased (2.7% to 31.0%; p < 0.001). Conservation surgery rates (odds ratio [OR], 1.058), low-to-intermediate nuclear grade rates (OR, 1.069), and the absence of comedonecrosis (OR, 1.104) significantly increased over time (all p < 0.05). Estrogen receptor (ER) negativity (OR, 0.935) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positivity rates (OR, 0.953) significantly decreased (all p < 0.05). The same trends were observed for the 613 asymptomatic patients. Conclusion: The rate of DCIS detected on ultrasound only significantly increased during 10 years. Low-to-intermediate nuclear grade rates significantly increased, whereas ER negativity and HER2 positivity rates significantly decreased during the same period. These findings suggest that DCIS detected on screening ultrasound is less aggressive than DCIS detected on mammography.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityrestriction-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherSpringer-
dc.relation.isPartOfANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.subject.MESHBreast / diagnostic imaging-
dc.subject.MESHBreast Neoplasms* / diagnostic imaging-
dc.subject.MESHBreast Neoplasms* / surgery-
dc.subject.MESHCarcinoma in Situ*-
dc.subject.MESHCarcinoma, Ductal, Breast* / diagnostic imaging-
dc.subject.MESHCarcinoma, Ductal, Breast* / surgery-
dc.subject.MESHCarcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating* / diagnostic imaging-
dc.subject.MESHCarcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating* / surgery-
dc.subject.MESHFemale-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHMammography-
dc.subject.MESHRetrospective Studies-
dc.titleChronological Trends of Breast Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Clinical, Radiologic, and Pathologic Perspectives-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Radiology (영상의학교실)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSi Eun Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHa Yan Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJung Hyun Yoon-
dc.contributor.googleauthorEun-Kyung Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJee Ye Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMin Jung Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorGa Ram Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYoungjean Vivian Park-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHee Jung Moon-
dc.identifier.doi10.1245/s10434-021-10378-3-
dc.contributor.localIdA00284-
dc.contributor.localIdA00473-
dc.contributor.localIdA00801-
dc.contributor.localIdA00984-
dc.contributor.localIdA01091-
dc.contributor.localIdA01572-
dc.contributor.localIdA02595-
dc.contributor.localIdA05611-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ00179-
dc.identifier.eissn1534-4681-
dc.identifier.pmid34196861-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1245%2Fs10434-021-10378-3-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Ga Ram-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor김가람-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor김민정-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor김은경-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor김지예-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor김하얀-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor박영진-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor윤정현-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor이시은-
dc.citation.volume28-
dc.citation.number13-
dc.citation.startPage8699-
dc.citation.endPage8709-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, Vol.28(13) : 8699-8709, 2021-12-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Biomedical Systems Informatics (의생명시스템정보학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Radiology (영상의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Surgery (외과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.