0 313

Cited 0 times in

Systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic performance of CT imaging for assessing resectability of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after neoadjuvant therapy: importance of CT criteria

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author박미숙-
dc.contributor.author신재승-
dc.contributor.author양현경-
dc.contributor.author황신혜-
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-28T17:22:03Z-
dc.date.available2021-12-28T17:22:03Z-
dc.date.issued2021-11-
dc.identifier.issn2366-004X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/187069-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To assess the CT diagnostic performance for evaluating resectability of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) after neoadjuvant therapy and identify the factor(s) that affect(s) diagnostic performance. Methods: Databases were searched to identify studies published from January 1, 2000, to November 5, 2019 that evaluated the CT diagnostic performance for assessing resectability of post-neoadjuvant PDAC. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed the study quality. A meta-analysis was performed to obtain summary sensitivity and specificity values using a bivariate random-effects model, and heterogeneity across studies was assessed. Univariable meta-regression analysis was performed with eight variables, including the different CT criteria for resectability, conventional National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) criteria for upfront surgery, and modified criteria for post-neoadjuvant surgery. Results: Ten studies were included and analyzed. The summary sensitivity and specificity for resectability were 78% (95% CI 68-86%) and 60% (95% CI 44-74%), respectively. No significant heterogeneity was identified (bivariate correlation coefficient ρ = - 1, p-value for hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristics model β = 0.667). The two different CT criteria showed different diagnostic performance (p < 0.01), with higher sensitivity (81% [95% CI 73-90%] vs. 28% [95% CI 15-42%], p < 0.01) and lower specificity (57% [95% CI 41-73%] vs. 90% [95% CI 80-100%], p < 0.01) for the modified criteria. No other variables affected the diagnostic performance. Conclusion: CT criteria were the factors that affected the diagnostic performance. Modification of the conventional criteria improved sensitivity but lowered specificity. Further modifications are required to improve specificity and uniformity.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityrestriction-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherSpringer-
dc.relation.isPartOfABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.subject.MESHCarcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal* / diagnostic imaging-
dc.subject.MESHCarcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal* / surgery-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHNeoadjuvant Therapy-
dc.subject.MESHNeoplasm Staging-
dc.subject.MESHPancreatic Neoplasms* / diagnostic imaging-
dc.subject.MESHPancreatic Neoplasms* / pathology-
dc.subject.MESHPancreatic Neoplasms* / surgery-
dc.subject.MESHSensitivity and Specificity-
dc.subject.MESHTomography, X-Ray Computed-
dc.titleSystematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic performance of CT imaging for assessing resectability of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after neoadjuvant therapy: importance of CT criteria-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Radiology (영상의학교실)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHyun Kyung Yang-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMi-Suk Park-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMiyoung Choi-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJaeseung Shin-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSeung Soo Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorWoo Kyoung Jeong-
dc.contributor.googleauthorShin Hye Hwang-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSang Hyun Choi-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00261-021-03198-2-
dc.contributor.localIdA01463-
dc.contributor.localIdA05599-
dc.contributor.localIdA06172-
dc.contributor.localIdA05534-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ03314-
dc.identifier.eissn2366-0058-
dc.identifier.pmid34331549-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00261-021-03198-2-
dc.subject.keywordCarcinoma-
dc.subject.keywordpancreatic ductal-
dc.subject.keywordNeoadjuvant therapy-
dc.subject.keywordNeoplasm staging-
dc.subject.keywordPancreatectomy-
dc.subject.keywordTomography-
dc.subject.keywordX-ray computed-
dc.contributor.alternativeNamePark, Mi Sook-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor박미숙-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor신재승-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor양현경-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor황신혜-
dc.citation.volume46-
dc.citation.number11-
dc.citation.startPage5201-
dc.citation.endPage5217-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, Vol.46(11) : 5201-5217, 2021-11-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Radiology (영상의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.