154 243

Cited 0 times in

혈정액증의 경직장 코일을 이용한 자기공명영상 소견: 경직장 초음파소견과의 비교

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author김명진-
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-28T08:22:43Z-
dc.date.available2021-09-28T08:22:43Z-
dc.date.issued1996-09-
dc.identifier.issn0301-2867-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/183608-
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: To describe MR findngs of the seminal tract using endorectal surface coil(ECMR) in patients with hemospermia and to compare them with transrectal ultrasonography(TRU TR US). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-fourpatients with hemospermia underwent MR imaging using a 1. 5T unit. T2-weighted fast spin echo axial, sagittal and coronal images, and T1-weighted spin echo axial images were obtained using on endorectal surface coil. MR finding sin 17 patients were compared with TRUS performed by urologist. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients(92%) demonstrated morphological abnormalities in the prostate and the seminal tract. On ECMR, 16 hemorrhagic foci were seen in 13patients. Prostatic cysts were seen in 14 patients(8 m llerian and 6 wolffian). These cysts showed high signal intensity on T2-weighted images. On T1-weighted images, m llerian duct cysts showed low signal intensity and wolffian duct cysts showed high signal intensity. On ECMR, calculi were seen in 18 patients. Of 17 cases who had both ECMR and TRUS, prostatic cysts were seen in 11 on ECMR and 5 cases on TRUS (p<0.05). No hemorrhage in theseminal tract was detected on TRUS. In is cases, calculi were clearly defined on ECMR, and in 11 cases on TRUS(p<0.1). CONCLUSIONS: ECMR demonstrated various lesions in patients with hemospermia and was superior to TRUS inthe localization of hemorrhage and detection of prostatic cysts and calculi.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.languageKorean-
dc.publisher대한방사선의학회-
dc.relation.isPartOfJournal of the Korean Radiologist Society(대한방사선의학회지)-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.title혈정액증의 경직장 코일을 이용한 자기공명영상 소견: 경직장 초음파소견과의 비교-
dc.title.alternativeMR Imaging of Hemospermia with an Endorectal Surface Coil: Comparison with Transrectal Ultrasonography-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Radiology (영상의학교실)-
dc.contributor.googleauthor원제환-
dc.contributor.googleauthor김명진-
dc.contributor.googleauthor이종태-
dc.contributor.googleauthor유형식-
dc.contributor.googleauthor이무상-
dc.identifier.doi10.3348/jkrs.1996.35.3.391-
dc.contributor.localIdA00426-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ01844-
dc.subject.keywordProstate, MR-
dc.subject.keywordMagnetic resonance(MR), coil array-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Myeong Jin-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor김명진-
dc.citation.volume35-
dc.citation.number3-
dc.citation.startPage391-
dc.citation.endPage396-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationJournal of the Korean Radiologist Society (대한방사선의학회지), Vol.35(3) : 391-396, 1996-09-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Radiology (영상의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.