0 478

Cited 5 times in

Extended application of subtraction arterial phase imaging in LI-RADS version 2018: a strategy to improve the diagnostic performance for hepatocellular carcinoma on gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author김명진-
dc.contributor.author김승섭-
dc.contributor.author박미숙-
dc.contributor.author배희진-
dc.contributor.author이선영-
dc.contributor.author정용은-
dc.contributor.author최진영-
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-29T17:08:48Z-
dc.date.available2021-04-29T17:08:48Z-
dc.date.issued2021-03-
dc.identifier.issn0938-7994-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/182206-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: This study aimed to assess the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) utilizing subtraction AP (arterial phase) imaging only for T1 hyperintense observations compared with the detection of HCC on subtraction AP imaging that included T1 hyper-, iso-, and hypointense lesions on gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI. Materials and methods: This retrospective study included 234 patients (311 observations including 239 HCCs) at high risk for HCC who underwent gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI with subtraction AP imaging between 2015 and 2017. Arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE) was divided into two subtypes: conventional APHE, where subtraction AP imaging is used to detect APHE only for T1 hyperintense observations; and modified APHE, where subtraction AP imaging is applied to T1 hyper-, iso-, and hypointense lesions. Two readers independently reviewed all observations and the per-observation diagnostic performances were compared using McNemar's test. Results: Modified nonrim APHE showed significantly higher sensitivity than conventional nonrim APHE (90.0% vs 82.8%; p < 0.001) for diagnosing HCC, without a significant difference in specificity (66.7% vs 68.1%; p > 0.999). The LR-5 category with modified nonrim APHE provided better sensitivity than the LR-5 with conventional nonrim APHE (70.3% vs 63.2%; p < 0.001), without a significant decrease in specificity (94.4% vs 95.8%; p > 0.999). Conclusion: Extended application of subtraction AP imaging for T1 hypo- or isointense observations on gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI can improve sensitivity in the diagnosis of HCC without a significant difference in specificity. Key points: • Modified nonrim arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE), extended application of subtraction arterial phase imaging for T1 hypo- or isointense observation, outperforms conventional nonrim APHE. • The LR-5 category with modified nonrim APHE provided better sensitivity in diagnosing HCC than the LR-5 with conventional APHE, without a significant decrease in specificity.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityrestriction-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherSpringer International-
dc.relation.isPartOfEUROPEAN RADIOLOGY-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.subject.MESHCarcinoma, Hepatocellular* / diagnostic imaging-
dc.subject.MESHContrast Media-
dc.subject.MESHGadolinium DTPA-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHLiver Neoplasms* / diagnostic imaging-
dc.subject.MESHMagnetic Resonance Imaging-
dc.subject.MESHRetrospective Studies-
dc.subject.MESHSensitivity and Specificity-
dc.titleExtended application of subtraction arterial phase imaging in LI-RADS version 2018: a strategy to improve the diagnostic performance for hepatocellular carcinoma on gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Radiology (영상의학교실)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSeung-Seob Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSunyoung Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHeejin Bae-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYong Eun Chung-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJin-Young Choi-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMi-Suk Park-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMyeong-Jin Kim-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00330-020-07229-2-
dc.contributor.localIdA00426-
dc.contributor.localIdA05097-
dc.contributor.localIdA01463-
dc.contributor.localIdA05346-
dc.contributor.localIdA05659-
dc.contributor.localIdA03662-
dc.contributor.localIdA04200-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ00851-
dc.identifier.eissn1432-1084-
dc.identifier.pmid32886205-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00330-020-07229-2-
dc.subject.keywordDiagnosis-
dc.subject.keywordLiver neoplasms-
dc.subject.keywordMagnetic resonance imaging-
dc.subject.keywordSensitivity and specificity-
dc.subject.keywordSubtraction technique-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Myeong Jin-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor김명진-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor김승섭-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor박미숙-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor배희진-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor이선영-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor정용은-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor최진영-
dc.citation.volume31-
dc.citation.number3-
dc.citation.startPage1620-
dc.citation.endPage1629-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationEUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, Vol.31(3) : 1620-1629, 2021-03-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Radiology (영상의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.