11 19

Cited 0 times in

Impact of the Learning Curve on the Survival of Abdominal or Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer

Authors
 Lan Ying Li  ;  Lan Ying Wen  ;  Sun Hee Park  ;  Eun Ji Nam  ;  Jung Yun Lee  ;  Sunghoon Kim  ;  Young Tae Kim  ;  Sang Wun Kim 
Citation
 CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, Vol.53(1) : 243-251, 2021-01 
Journal Title
 CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT 
ISSN
 1598-2998 
Issue Date
2021-01
Keywords
Learning curve ; Minimally invasive surgical procedures ; Uterine cervical neoplasms
Abstract
Purpose: The objective of this study was to define the learning curve required to attain satisfactory oncologic outcomes of cervical cancer patients who were undergoing open or minimally invasive surgery for radical hysterectomy, and to analyze the correlation between the learning curve and tumor size. Materials and methods: Cervical cancer patients (stage IA-IIA) who underwent open radical hysterectomy (n=280) or minimal invasive radical hysterectomy (n=282) were retrospectively reviewed. The learning curve was evaluated using cumulative sum of 5-year recurrence rates. Survival outcomes were analyzed based on the operation period ("learning period," P1 vs. "skilled period," P2), operation mode, and tumor size. Results: The 5-year disease-free and overall survival rates between open and minimally invasive groups were 91.8% and 89.0% (p=0.098) and 96.1% and 97.2% (p=0.944), respectively. The number of surgeries for learning period was 30 and 60 in open and minimally invasive group, respectively. P2 had better 5-year disease-free survival than P1 after adjusting for risk factors (hazard ratio, 0.392; 95% confidence interval, 0.210 to 0.734; p=0.003). All patients with tumors < 2 cm had similar 5-year disease-free survival regardless of operation mode or learning curve. Minimally invasive group presented lower survival rates than open group when tumors ≥ 2 cm in P2. Preoperative conization improved disease-free survival in patients with tumors ≥ 2 cm, especially in minimally invasive group. Conclusion: Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy required more cases than open group to achieve acceptable 5-year disease-free survival. When tumors ≥ 2 cm, the surgeon's proficiency affected survival outcomes in both groups.
Files in This Item:
T202100361.pdf Download
DOI
10.4143/crt.2020.063
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology (산부인과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Yonsei Biomedical Research Center (연세의생명연구원) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Kim, Sang Wun(김상운) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8342-8701
Kim, Sung Hoon(김성훈) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1645-7473
Kim, Young Tae(김영태) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7347-1052
Nam, Eun Ji(남은지) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0189-3560
Li, Lan Ying(리란영)
Park, Seon Hee(박선희)
Lee, Jung-Yun(이정윤) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7948-1350
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/182065
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links