8 8

Cited 0 times in

Accuracy of the Hand-held Wavefront Aberrometer in Measurement of Refractive Error

Authors
 Jae Yong Han  ;  Sangchul Yoon  ;  Nicolas Scott Brown  ;  Sueng Han Han  ;  Jinu Han 
Citation
 Korean Journal of Ophthalmology, Vol.34(3) : 227-234, 2020-06 
Journal Title
 Korean Journal of Ophthalmology 
ISSN
 1011-8942 
Issue Date
2020-06
Keywords
Corneal wavefront aberration ; Mydriatics ; Refractive errors ; Refractometry
Abstract
Purpose: To compare refractive error measured by hand-held wavefront aberrometers with postcycloplegic autorefraction (AR) and cycloplegic refraction (CR). Methods: The medical records of patients who received refractive measurements using the wavefront aberrometer, postcycloplegic AR, and CR between January 2014 and January 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. The mean differences, 95% confidence intervals, and limits of agreement (LOA) were calculated for the refractive vector components (M, J₀, and J45 ). Results: Fifty-one patients (9.0 ± 5.5 years, male 41.2%) were enrolled in this study, and only the right eye of each was included. Refractive errors ranged from -9.25 to +7.25 diopters (D) for spherical equivalent (median, 0.75 D). The M component was not significantly different among the three methods (p = 0.080). However, the J₀ vector component was significantly different (p < 0.001). After post hoc analysis, the wavefront aberrometer obtained more positive values for J₀ compared to the other methods. The J45 component was not significantly different among the three methods (p = 0.143). The mean difference between the wavefront aberrometer and postcycloplegic AR was -0.115 D (LOA, -1.578 to 1.348 D) for M, 0.239 D (LOA, -0.371 to 0.850 D) for J₀, and -0.015 D (LOA, -0.768 to 0.738 D) for J45 . The mean difference between the wavefront aberrometer and CR was -0.220 D (LOA, -1.790 to 1.350 D) for M, 0.300 D (LOA, -0.526 to 1.127 D) for J₀, and -0.079 D (-0.662 to 0.504 D) for J45 . Conclusions: The wavefront aberrometer showed good agreement with postcycloplegic AR and CR in spherical equivalents, but tended to produce slightly myopic results. The wavefront aberrometer also overestimated with-the-rule astigmatism. Therefore, we recommend that the device be used for estimations of refractive error, which may be useful for patients who have postural difficulties, live in undeveloped countries, or are bedridden.
Files in This Item:
T202002422.pdf Download
DOI
10.3341/kjo.2019.0132
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Ophthalmology (안과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Han, Seung Han(한승한) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8972-4790
Han, Jinu(한진우) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8607-6625
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/179338
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links