0 51

Cited 0 times in

Debriefing methods and learning outcomes in simulation nursing education: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors
 JuHee Lee  ;  Hyejung Lee  ;  Sue Kim  ;  Mona Choi  ;  Il Sun Ko  ;  JuYeon Bae  ;  Sung Hae Kim 
Citation
 NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, Vol.87 : 104345, 2020-04 
Journal Title
 NURSE EDUCATION TODAY 
ISSN
 0260-6917 
Issue Date
2020-04
Keywords
Debriefing ; Education ; Learning outcomes ; Meta-analysis ; Nursing ; Simulation ; Systematic review
Abstract
Objectives: Simulation can serve as an effective educational method to provide experience and opportunities to learn about the nursing management of clinical cases in a secure environment. Numerous debriefing methods have been used in simulation in nurse education to improve clinical competencies and learning outcomes. However, there is insufficient evidence to identify the debriefing methods that are most effective in improving learning outcomes. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, the focus is on debriefing methods and learning outcomes in simulation in nurse education. Design: This systematic review was conducted according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement. Data sources: Studies published from January 1995 to December 2016 were identified from PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, and Korean databases. Review methods: Experimental studies that used debriefing methods in simulation in nurse education were included as review studies. Studies that used identical validated measurement tools were included in the meta-analysis. We applied a random-effects model with subgroups. Effect sizes for learning outcomes according to debriefing methods were calculated using standardized mean differences. Results: A total of 18 studies were selected through systematic review and 7 studies were included in the meta-analysis using four types of scales measuring learning outcomes after debriefing. The overall effect size of the learning outcomes, according to the type of debriefing method, was 0.31. The results regarding debriefing methods were statistically non-significant in the learning outcomes (95% CI [-0.33-0.96], Z = 0.95, p = 0.34). A symmetric shape indicated a lack of publication bias. Conclusions: The study findings indicated that structured debriefing helped to improve learning. Future studies are needed to provide effective debriefing strategies with larger sample sizes.
Full Text
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0260691719306495
DOI
10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104345
Appears in Collections:
3. College of Nursing (간호대학) > Dept. of Nursing (간호학과) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Ko, Il Sun(고일선) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3671-4833
Kim, Sue(김수) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3785-2445
Lee, JuHee(이주희) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2805-1622
Lee, Hyejung(이혜정) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9357-0640
Choi, Mona(최모나) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4694-0359
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/179153
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links