0 276

Cited 22 times in

Comparison of the Use of the Transrectal Surface Coil and the Pelvic Phased-Array Coil in MR Imaging for Preoperative Evaluation of Uterine Cervical Carcinoma

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author김명진-
dc.contributor.author정재준-
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-03T17:05:04Z-
dc.date.available2020-07-03T17:05:04Z-
dc.date.issued1997-
dc.identifier.issn0361-803X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/177256-
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of fast spin-echo MR imaging that uses a transrectal surface coil with the accuracy of fast spin-echo MR imaging that uses a pelvic phased-array coil for preoperative local staging of uterine cervical carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-two patients with pathologically confirmed invasive cervical carcinoma who underwent MR imaging using both a pelvic phased-array coil and a transrectal surface coil were retrospectively evaluated. Both sets of images were reviewed in random order by three observers who then reached a consensus opinion at a second session. Among the 28 patients who underwent radical hysterectomy, findings from MR imaging and pathologic staging were compared. In the remaining nonsurgical cases, findings from MR imaging using a transrectal surface coil and MR imaging using a pelvic phased-array coil were compared with findings from pelvic examinations under general anesthesia. RESULTS: MR imaging using a transrectal surface coil revealed 50 (88%) of the 57 tumors found at surgery, and MR imaging using a pelvic phased-array coil revealed 44 (77%) of the 57 tumors, resulting in a statistically significant (p < .05) difference. In patients who underwent surgery (n = 28), the accuracy of the overall staging and the parametrial evaluation were not significantly different for MR imaging using a transrectal surface coil and MR imaging using a pelvic phased-array coil (89% and 96%, respectively, on MR imaging using a transrectal surface coil; 89% and 93%, respectively, on MR imaging using a pelvic phased-array coil). For the patients who did not undergo surgery (n = 34), MR imaging using a transrectal surface coil and MR imaging using a pelvic phased-array coil corresponded in 82% for overall staging and in 92% for parametrial invasion. CONCLUSION: The use of a transrectal surface coil improved detection of small tumors of the uterine cervix but did not significantly improve the accuracy of overall staging or the accuracy of assessment of parametrial invasion.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityrestriction-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherSpringfield, Ill., Thomas-
dc.relation.isPartOfAMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.subject.MESHAdult-
dc.subject.MESHCervix Uteri/pathology-
dc.subject.MESHFemale-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHMagnetic Resonance Imaging/instrumentation*-
dc.subject.MESHMagnetic Resonance Imaging/methods-
dc.subject.MESHNeoplasm Staging-
dc.subject.MESHPreoperative Care-
dc.subject.MESHRetrospective Studies-
dc.subject.MESHUterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis*-
dc.subject.MESHUterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology-
dc.subject.MESHUterine Cervical Neoplasms/surgery-
dc.titleComparison of the Use of the Transrectal Surface Coil and the Pelvic Phased-Array Coil in MR Imaging for Preoperative Evaluation of Uterine Cervical Carcinoma-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Radiology (영상의학교실)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMyeong-Jin Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJae-Joon Chung-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYeon Hee Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJong Tae Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHyung Sik Yoo-
dc.identifier.doi10.2214/ajr.168.5.9129414-
dc.contributor.localIdA00426-
dc.contributor.localIdA03712-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ00116-
dc.identifier.eissn1546-3141-
dc.identifier.pmid9129414-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.ajronline.org/doi/abs/10.2214/ajr.168.5.9129414-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Myeong Jin-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor김명진-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor정재준-
dc.citation.volume168-
dc.citation.number5-
dc.citation.startPage1215-
dc.citation.endPage1221-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationAMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, Vol.168(5) : 1215-1221, 1997-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Radiology (영상의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.